MHB Contour Integration: Calculating the Integral of $1/z$ with Residue Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fermat1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of \( \frac{1}{z} \) around a contour \( C \) that does not enclose the pole at \( z=0 \) evaluates to zero. The discussion emphasizes that the contour must remain entirely in the left half-plane, specifically from \( -\sqrt{3}+i \) to \( -\sqrt{3}-i \). Participants clarified that the winding number is crucial for applying Cauchy's residue theorem, but since the contour does not enclose the singularity, the integral remains unaffected by the path taken, resulting in a value of zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals
  • Cauchy's residue theorem
  • Understanding of contour integration
  • Complex logarithm properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Cauchy's residue theorem applications in complex analysis
  • Learn about calculating winding numbers in contour integration
  • Explore complex logarithm properties and their implications
  • Investigate the implications of singularities in contour integrals
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on complex analysis, as well as anyone interested in mastering contour integration techniques and residue calculations.

Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Calculate the integral of $1/z$ around $C$, where $C$ is any contour going from $-\sqrt{3}+i$ to $-\sqrt{3}-i$ and is contained in the set of complex numbers whose real part is negative.

My answer: Let $f=1/z$ Then $f$ has a simple pole at $z=0$ with residue 1. How do I calculate the winding number so I can use the residue formula?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fermat said:
Calculate the integral of $1/z$ around $C$, where $C$ is any contour going from $-\sqrt{3}+i$ to $-\sqrt{3}-i$ and is contained in the set of complex numbers whose real part is negative.

My answer: Let $f=1/z$ Then $f$ has a simple pole at $z=0$ with residue 1. How do I calculate the winding number so I can use the residue formula?

Thanks

Choose any contour that doesn't include z = 0. Maybe the semicircle to the left of these points centred at $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( -\sqrt{3} , 0 \right) \end{align*}$.
 
Prove It said:
Choose any contour that doesn't include z = 0. Maybe the semicircle to the left of these points centred at $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \left( -\sqrt{3} , 0 \right) \end{align*}$.

So the value depends on whether the contour encloses zero?
 
Fermat said:
So the value depends on whether the contour encloses zero?

The contour CAN'T enclose z = 0 + 0i, surely you can see its real part is NOT negative.

So yes, the value of the integral will change if your contour contains this point. But you are told specifically to NOT include it.
 
Prove It said:
The contour CAN'T enclose z = 0 + 0i, surely you can see its real part is NOT negative.

So yes, the value of the integral will change if your contour contains this point. But you are told specifically to NOT include it.

ok sorry, I was a bit thrown by you saying to choose a contour. So in fact the integral is zero?
 
Fermat said:
Calculate the integral of $1/z$ around $C$, where $C$ is any contour going from $-\sqrt{3}+i$ to $-\sqrt{3}-i$ and is contained in the set of complex numbers whose real part is negative.

My answer: Let $f=1/z$ Then $f$ has a simple pole at $z=0$ with residue 1. How do I calculate the winding number so I can use the residue formula?

Thanks

Any path that leaves to the left point z = 0 is valid, so that you can choose a straight path. Setting $\displaystyle z= -\sqrt{3} + i\ t$ You have...

$\displaystyle \int_{C} \frac{d z}{z} = \int_{1}^{-1} \frac{d t}{- \sqrt{3} + i\ t} = i \ln \frac{\sqrt{3}- i}{\sqrt{3} + i}\ (1)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
chisigma said:
Any path that leaves to the left point z = 0 is valid, so that you can choose a straight path. Setting $\displaystyle z= -\sqrt{3} + i\ t$ You have...

$\displaystyle \int_{C} \frac{d z}{z} = \int_{1}^{-1} \frac{d t}{- \sqrt{3} + i\ t} = i \ln \frac{\sqrt{3}- i}{\sqrt{3} + i}\ (1)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

I wanted to use cauchy's residue formula.
 
Fermat said:
I wanted to use cauchy's residue formula.

How can a contour that doesn't have any singular points in it possibly give any residue?
 
Fermat said:
I wanted to use cauchy's residue formula.

The basic concept is well understood observing the figure...View attachment 2771

It is required to compute the integral $\displaystyle \int_{A B} \frac{d z}{z}$ along a path located entirely in the left half-plane. Two possible paths are AB and ACB. But f(z) is analytic inside the triangle ABC so that is $\displaystyle \int_{A B C A} \frac{d z}{z} = 0$ and that means that the integral computed along the paths AB and ACB are the same, i.e. the value of the integral doesn't depend from the path if it located entirely in the left half plane. The most comfortable path is of course the straigh line AB...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 

Attachments

  • MHB11.png
    MHB11.png
    1.9 KB · Views: 123
  • #10
chisigma said:
Any path that leaves to the left point z = 0 is valid, so that you can choose a straight path. Setting $\displaystyle z= -\sqrt{3} + i\ t$ You have...

$\displaystyle \int_{C} \frac{d z}{z} = \int_{1}^{-1} \frac{d t}{- \sqrt{3} + i\ t} = i \ln \frac{\sqrt{3}- i}{\sqrt{3} + i}\ (1)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

you should have factored in $z'=i$. So I get $ln(-{\sqrt{3}}-i)-ln(-{\sqrt{3}}+i)$. Can I use log laws even though its complex log? Cheers
 
  • #11
Fermat said:
you should have factored in $z'=i$. So I get $ln(-{\sqrt{3}}-i)-ln(-{\sqrt{3}}+i)$. Can I use log laws even though its complex log? Cheers

Yes, You can! (Happy) ...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #12
chisigma said:
Yes, You can! (Happy) ...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

So you admit you made a mistake? Regarding the subtraction law, Wikipedia says they may differ by a multiple of 2pi
 
  • #13
Fermat said:
So you admit you made a mistake?...

Perhaps a more diplomatic approach would be:

"Was I correct in needing to factor in $i$?"
 
  • #14
Fermat said:
So you admit you made a mistake? Regarding the subtraction law, Wikipedia says they may differ by a multiple of 2pi
View attachment 2772

If Wikipedia says so ... what can we do as humans? (Tmi)...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 

Attachments

  • For Fermat.png
    For Fermat.png
    42.3 KB · Views: 110

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K