Contour Integration for Inverse Mellin Transform

  • Thread starter Thread starter Love*Physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Transform
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of contour integration to solve the Inverse Mellin Transform, specifically the integral of the function \(\frac{\pi}{\sin(\pi s)}\). The integral is evaluated using the Residue Theorem, resulting in the infinite sum of residues at the poles located at \(n=0, -1, -2, \ldots\). The contour chosen is rectangular, with boundaries extending to \(c \pm i \infty\), effectively enclosing the relevant poles. The final result of the Inverse Mellin Transform is \(\frac{1}{1+x}\) for \(|x|<1\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of contour integration
  • Familiarity with the Residue Theorem
  • Knowledge of Mellin transforms
  • Basic complex analysis concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Residue Theorem in complex analysis
  • Explore more examples of Mellin transforms
  • Learn about the properties of sine functions in complex analysis
  • Investigate the implications of poles in contour integration
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of complex analysis looking to deepen their understanding of contour integration and its applications in transforms.

Love*Physics
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Can anyone gave me a solved example on Inverse Mellin transform?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. I think Wikipedia has a good section on the Mellin transform pair. Although they go about it a little differently, the integral is just the sum of the residues inside the indicated contour.

\mathcal{M}^{-1}\left\{\frac{\pi}{\sin(\pi s)}\right\}=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\mathop\int\limits_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty}\frac{\pi}{x^s\sin(\pi s)}ds=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(-x)^n=\frac{1}{1+x};\quad |x|&lt;1.

That sum is obtained from taking the residues inside a square contour with right boundary on c\pm i\infty and allowed to expand to infinity. The integral tends to zero on the remaining three legs and we're left with (via the Residue Theorem) an infinite sum of residues corresponding to the poles at -n:

\mathop\textnormal{Res}\limits_{z=-n}\left\{\frac{\pi}{x^s\sin(\pi s)}\right\}=(-x)^n,\quad n=0,-1,-2,\cdots
 
ok but Why you choose the pole -n ? i can take the residue at n and 0
 
Ok, approach this strictly in terms of contour integration: it's a rectangular contour with corners at c\pm i \infty, and -\infty\pm i\infty. Then that contour encloses the poles at n=0,-1,-2,-3,\cdots. And by the Residue Theorem, the integral, assuming the other legs go to zero, is just 2\pi i times the sum of the residues at that set of poles.

Also, I though it was a bit of a challenge to show:

<br /> \mathop\textnormal{Res}\limits_{z=-n}\left\{\frac{\pi}{x^s\sin(\pi s)}\right\}=(-x)^n,\quad n=0,-1,-2,\cdots<br />

for me anyway. Maybe an easier way to do though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K