Contradiction in the laws of thermodynamics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around apparent contradictions between the second and third laws of thermodynamics, particularly in the context of the universe's cooling and entropy behavior. Participants explore theoretical implications, the relevance of the third law, and the nature of entropy in various states of matter, including black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the second law states entropy in a system always increases, while the third law indicates entropy approaches zero as temperature approaches absolute zero, questioning how these can coexist in a cooling universe.
  • Another participant challenges the interpretation of the third law, noting that it specifically refers to the entropy of a perfect crystal at absolute zero and does not address the approach to that state.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the third law's focus on perfect crystals, questioning its relevance compared to the broader implications of the first two laws.
  • One suggestion is that the entropy of black holes may provide insight into these thermodynamic laws, referencing external sources for further exploration.
  • Another participant argues that while the universe is cooling, its entropy is increasing due to the transformation of energy forms, suggesting that the universe's structure will eventually become more random and higher in entropy.
  • A later post discusses the implications of reaching absolute zero, suggesting that it is theoretically impossible due to the constraints of entropy as described by Boltzmann's equation, and posits that the universe may cool to a finite temperature instead.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the third law of thermodynamics and its implications, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a consensus on how these laws interact in the context of the universe's entropy.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about the nature of perfect crystals, the definition of entropy, and the implications of quantum mechanics on entropy values. The discussion also reflects uncertainty about the universe's ultimate fate and temperature behavior.

Maximise24
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
The second law of thermodynamics states that the entropy in a system, such as our universe, always increases. The third law, however, says that entropy reaches zero as a system approaches absolute zero temperature.

Our universe has been cooling off since its origin (because of its expansion), accounting for a myriad of interesting physical bodies and processes, but how is this not at odds with both thermodynamical laws? If the system that is our universe is cooling (and indeed slowly approaching absolute zero), its entropy could be said to decrease. The second law however dictates that it must increase invariably. Which is right?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The third law, however, says that entropy reaches zero as a system approaches absolute zero temperature.


Where did you get that?

My version says that at absolute zero the entropy of a perfect crystal is zero.

It says nothing about the approach and perfect crystals are about as common as ideal gasses or hens' teeth.
 
I suppose my confusion comes from the seeming banality of the third law. The first two are very grand in scale and applicable to the entire universe. Why, then, does the third only say something about crystals? What's the relevance?
 
The universe is cooling and its entropy is increasing.
But I think the reason the universe is said to be cooling is because its energy density is decreasing. (Since distant galaxies are getting further away from each other). So its not like cooling a volume of gas inside a box of fixed volume.

The forms of energy in the universe are turning from lower entropy forms into higher entropy forms. (For example, stars are burning up their fuel). So far into the future, it is possible that the structure of our current galaxy e.t.c. will no longer exist, and its contents will be strewn about in a random way. Clearly this is a higher entropy state.
 
The fact/postulate that the entropy is zero at the zero of temperature is also often used, in conjunction with the Second Law, as the basis for saying that it is impossible for any system to reach 0 K. It's beyond my expertise, but I would presume that, in the theory of "infinite" expansion of the universe (note that there are other theories, e.g. the big crunch), the universe would cool to some homogeneous finite (infinitesimal?) temperature.

Furthermore, Boltzmann's equation, S=k ln W, places a strict restriction on the possible values of the entropy. Quantum mechanically, the smallest value W could have is the degeneracy of the ground state. Assuming that the universe does not have a singly-degenerate ground state, then it is impossible for the universe to ever see a zero entropy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K