Contradiction of statement regarding monotonicity

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter oferon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Contradiction
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
oferon
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Hi all!
We were given to proove or falsify the following statement:

Given [tex]f(x)>0 \,\ ,\,x>0 \,\,\,\,,\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=0[/tex]
Then f(x) is strictly decreasing at certain aεℝ for every x>a

Now in their solution they contradicted the statement with:
[tex]\newcommand{\twopartdef}[4]<br /> {<br /> \left\{<br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> #1 & \mbox{if } #2 \\<br /> #3 & \mbox{if } #4<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right. } f(x) = \twopartdef { \frac{1}{2x} } {x \,\,\, rational} {\frac{1}{x}} {x \,\,\, irrational}[/tex]

Now i thought of another one: [tex]f(x)=\frac{sin(x)+2}{x^2}[/tex]
Is that a good example? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oferon said:
Hi all!
We were given to proove or falsify the following statement:

Given [tex]f(x)>0 \,\ ,\,x>0 \,\,\,\,,\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=0[/tex]
Then f(x) is strictly decreasing at certain aεℝ for every x>a

Now in their solution they contradicted the statement with:
[tex]\newcommand{\twopartdef}[4]<br /> {<br /> \left\{<br /> \begin{array}{ll}<br /> #1 & \mbox{if } #2 \\<br /> #3 & \mbox{if } #4<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right. } f(x) = \twopartdef { \frac{1}{2x} } {x \,\,\, rational} {\frac{1}{x}} {x \,\,\, irrational}[/tex]

Now i thought of another one: [tex]f(x)=\frac{sin(x)+2}{x^2}[/tex]
Is that a good example? Thank you!

Yes, that's a nice example too. If it is something to hand in you would want to include an argument to show that it isn't strictly decreasing for x large enough.