Convergence in Topological Spaces .... Singh, Example 4.1.1 .... ....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Example 4.1.1 from Tej Bahadur Singh's "Elements of Topology," which asserts that no rational number can be a limit of a sequence in the set of irrational numbers, denoted as ##\mathbb{R} - \mathbb{Q}##. A proof by contradiction is provided, demonstrating that if a sequence of irrational numbers converges to a rational number, an open neighborhood can be constructed that excludes all terms of the sequence, thereby contradicting the definition of convergence. This establishes that rational numbers cannot serve as limits for sequences comprised solely of irrational numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic topology concepts, including neighborhoods and convergence.
  • Familiarity with the real number system, specifically the distinction between rational and irrational numbers.
  • Knowledge of sequences and their limits in mathematical analysis.
  • Ability to interpret and construct proofs, particularly proof by contradiction.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions of neighborhoods in topology as presented in "Elements of Topology" by Tej Bahadur Singh.
  • Explore the concept of convergence in metric spaces, focusing on sequences and their limits.
  • Investigate the properties of rational and irrational numbers within the context of real analysis.
  • Practice constructing proofs by contradiction in various mathematical contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying topology and real analysis, educators teaching these concepts, and anyone interested in the properties of sequences in topological spaces.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR
I need help in order to fully understand an example concerning convergence in the space of real numbers with the co-countable topology ...
I am reading Tej Bahadur Singh: Elements of Topology, CRC Press, 2013 ... ... and am currently focused on Chapter 4, Section 4.1: Sequences ...

I need help in order to fully understand Example 4.1.1 ...Example 4.1.1 reads as follows:
Singh - Example  4.1.1 ... .png

In the above example from Singh we read the following:

" ... ...no rational number is a limit of a sequence in ##\mathbb{R} - \mathbb{Q}## ... ... "My question is as follows:

Why exactly is it the case that no rational number a limit of a sequence in ##\mathbb{R} - \mathbb{Q}## ... ... "
Help will be appreciated ...

Peter=====================================================================================It may help readers of the above post to have access to Singh's definition of a neighborhood and to the start of Chapter 4 (which gives the relevant definitions) ... so I am providing the text as follows:
Singh - Defn 1.2.5 ... ... NBD ... .png

Singh - 1 - Start of Chapter 4 ... PART 1 .png

Singh - 2 - Start of Chapter 4 ... PART 2 .png

Hope that helps ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose for contradiction that ##\langle x_n\rangle## is a sequence in ##\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q}## that converges to a rational number ##x##. Let ##U=\mathbb{R}\setminus\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty \{x_n\}##. This is an open set in ##\mathbb{R}_c## because its complement is the set of the ##x_n##, which is (at most) countable. Also ##x\in U## because ##x## is not any of the ##x_n## (since the ##x_n## are all irrational). So ##U## is an open neighborhood of ##x## that doesn't contain any of the ##x_n##. This means that the ##x_n## do not converge to ##x##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 587159 and Math Amateur
Infrared said:
Suppose for contradiction that ##\langle x_n\rangle## is a sequence in ##\mathbb{R}\setminus\mathbb{Q}## that converges to a rational number ##x##. Let ##U=\mathbb{R}\setminus\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty \{x_n\}##. This is an open set in ##\mathbb{R}_c## because its complement is the set of the ##x_n##, which is (at most) countable. Also ##x\in U## because ##x## is not any of the ##x_n## (since the ##x_n## are all irrational). So ##U## is an open neighborhood of ##x## that doesn't contain any of the ##x_n##. This means that the ##x_n## do not converge to ##x##.
Thanks for the help Infrared ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K