The Indiscrete Topology is Pseudometrizable ... Willard, Example 3.2(d)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example Topology
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the concept of pseudometrizability in relation to the indiscrete topology, specifically referencing Example 3.2(d) from Stephen Willard's "General Topology." Participants seek to clarify the relationship between the trivial pseudometric and the topology it generates, as well as the implications of Example 2.7(e) regarding closed sets.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that the trivial pseudometric defines the distance between any two points as zero, leading to a topology that consists only of the empty set and the entire space.
  • Others challenge the assertion in Example 2.7(e) that one-point sets are closed, arguing that under the trivial topology, one-point sets are neither open nor closed.
  • One participant notes that in the discrete topology, one-point sets are both open and closed, contrasting this with the indiscrete topology.
  • There is a repeated emphasis that in any space with two or more points under the indiscrete topology, no singleton set can be closed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the characterization of one-point sets as closed in the context of the trivial topology. There is no consensus on this point, as some participants support the original claim while others refute it.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reveals limitations in understanding the implications of the trivial pseudometric and its relationship to closed sets, particularly in distinguishing between the indiscrete and discrete topologies.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR
I need help in order to make sense of an Example of Stephen Willard's on the trivial topology and the trivial pseudometric ... I find the example confusing ...
I am reading Stephen Willard: General Topology ... ... and am currently focused on Chapter 1: Set Theory and Metric Spaces and am currently focused on Section 2: Metric Spaces ... ...

I need help in order to fully understand Example 3.2(d) ... .. Example 3.2(d) reads as follows:
Willard - Example 3.2 (d) ... .png
and Example 2.7(e) reads as follows:
Willard - Example 2.7 (e) ... .png
In Example 3.2(d) we read the following:

" ... It is pseudometrizable since it is the topology generated by the trivial pseudometric on X, by part (e) of Example 2.7. ... ... "I am somewhat lost by this example ...

Can someone please demonstrate that (X, ##\tau## ) is the topology generated by the trivial pseudometric on X ... and explain the relation to part (e) of Example 2.7. ...Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you remind us of the meaning of "Pseudometrizable" and "Pseudo metric"?
 
Hello Peter. Good to hear from you. Hope you're managing OK in the current difficult times.

The trivial pseudometric on a space is the one that says the distance between any two points is zero. It is 'pseudo' because a real metric requires a nonzero distance between any distinct points.

The topology generated by a metric is the one generated by the open balls of the metric. An open ball centred on P with radius r is the set of all points with distance less than r from P. Under the trivial pseudometric, for any point P, all points in the space are in every open ball of nonzero radius, because they are all distance zero away!
So the only open balls are the empty set (r=0, P anywhere ) and the universal set (r>0, P anywhere). The topology generated by those two is the trivial topology that consists of just those two open sets.
 
I don't think I agree with (e) that one-point sets are closed. Consider where X = {1, 2}. Under the trivial topology, the open sets are {} and {1, 2}. The closed sets are the complements of those, which are {1, 2} and {}. As you can see, neither of the one-point sets {1} or {2} is open or closed. In the discrete topology - the maximal topology that is in some sense the opposite of the indiscrete/trivial topology - one-point sets are closed, as well as open ("clopen"). That's because the topology is defined by every one-point set being open, and every one-point set is the complement of the union of all the other points. That union is open, so the one-point set is closed.
 
andrewkirk said:
I don't think I agree with (e) that one-point sets are closed. Consider where X = {1, 2}. Under the trivial topology, the open sets are {} and {1, 2}. The closed sets are the complements of those, which are {1, 2} and {}. As you can see, neither of the one-point sets {1} or {2} is open or closed. In the discrete topology - the maximal topology that is in some sense the opposite of the indiscrete/trivial topology - one-point sets are closed, as well as open ("clopen"). That's because the topology is defined by every one-point set being open, and every one-point set is the complement of the union of all the other points. That union is open, so the one-point set is closed.

I agree with this. In general in any space with 2 or more poinys that has the indiscrete topology (thus only nothing and everything are open sets), no singelton is closed.
 
andrewkirk said:
I don't think I agree with (e) that one-point sets are closed. Consider where X = {1, 2}. Under the trivial topology, the open sets are {} and {1, 2}. The closed sets are the complements of those, which are {1, 2} and {}. As you can see, neither of the one-point sets {1} or {2} is open or closed. In the discrete topology - the maximal topology that is in some sense the opposite of the indiscrete/trivial topology - one-point sets are closed, as well as open ("clopen"). That's because the topology is defined by every one-point set being open, and every one-point set is the complement of the union of all the other points. That union is open, so the one-point set is closed.
Hi Andrew ...

I am fine, thanks ... hope that you are well also ...

Thanks for clarifying the issue ... especially the point of Example 2.7(e) ... that is the part that confused me ...

Peter
 
Math_QED said:
I agree with this. In general in any space with 2 or more poinys that has the indiscrete topology (thus only nothing and everything are open sets), no singelton is closed.

Thanks Math_QED ...

Appreciate your help ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K