Convergence of an Infinite series and a related Qn

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the convergence of the infinite series \(\sum_{x=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{x^{(1+\epsilon)}}\right)\) where \(\epsilon\) is a small positive real number. It is established that the series converges for \(n \geq 2\) using induction and the ratio test. The integral test is also suggested as a method for proving convergence, particularly for values of \(n\) between 1 and 2. References to Lang's Complex Analysis and Foote's proof provide additional resources for understanding the Riemann Zeta Function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of infinite series and convergence criteria
  • Familiarity with the ratio test for series convergence
  • Knowledge of the integral test for convergence
  • Basic concepts of the Riemann Zeta Function
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integral test for convergence in detail
  • Explore Lang's Complex Analysis for proofs related to the Riemann Zeta Function
  • Learn about the properties of the Riemann Zeta Function
  • Investigate the application of induction in proving convergence of series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of calculus, and anyone interested in the convergence of infinite series and the Riemann Zeta Function.

bincy
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Dear friends,

[math] \sum_{x=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x}[/math] diverges.

But [math] \sum_{x=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{x^{2}}=\frac{\pi^{2}}{6}[/math]

How can we prove that [math] \sum_{x=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{x^{\left(1+epsilon\right)}}\right)[/math] converges to a finite value?
Thanks in advance.

Bincy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I preface every post like this that I could very well be wrong, but here is my take on it before someone else can confirm/deny my reasoning or provide a different proof.

If epsilon is an integer then I think induction can prove this.

1) Looking at [math]\frac{1}{x^n}[/math] you know it converges for n=2. I suppose your question is looking at [math]\frac{1}{x^{n+1}}[/math], so n=1 is true.

2) Using the ratio test, you can show that if n converges that implies that (n+1) converges.
 
Last edited:
I agree whatever you said. But there is a small catch.By epsilon, I meant that a very small real no. like 10^-10. For n>=2, we can prove the convergence of the series. But what about 1<n<2 ? If we can prove the convergence for n=1+ (1+ means epsilon greater than 1), any infinite series of this kind converges for n>1.
 
I think you can use the integral test for convergence.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
I think you can use the integral test for convergence.

Interestingly Wikipedia uses the OP's problem as an example of the integral test.
 
I believe there is a nice proof in Lang's Complex Analysis of the Riemann Zeta Function. If not, I have a proof from Foote.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K