Convergence of Constant Measure Sets in Finite Measure Spaces?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of constant measure sets within finite measure spaces, specifically questioning whether a sequence of measurable subsets with constant positive measure must contain a subsequence whose intersection has positive measure.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of the statement regarding the existence of a subsequence with positive measure in the intersection of sets with constant positive measure.
  • Another participant asserts that the statement is false, providing an example using the Lebesgue measure on the interval [0,1], where a sequence of sets, each of measure 1/2, has an intersection of measure zero.
  • A specific example is given where the sets E_n are defined using the sine function, illustrating that the intersection of any subsequence results in measure zero.
  • The construction of E_n as a disjoint union of intervals is noted, with a suggestion to use binary expansion to demonstrate the measure of the intersection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there is disagreement regarding the original claim, with one participant providing a counterexample that suggests the claim is false.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on the properties of the measure space and the specific construction of the sets involved, which may influence the outcome of the intersection's measure.

SpaceTag
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
This question came up recently, and I'm wondering whether or not it's true:

Let (X,A,m) be a finite measure space. Let E_1,E_2,... be a sequence of measurable subsets of X of constant positive measure (i.e., there exists c>0 such that m(E_i) = c for all i). Then there exists a subsequence of the sequence E_1,E_2,... whose intersection has positive measure.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Got it! It's false.

I have an example in X=[0,1] (with ordinary Lebesgue measure) of a sequence of sets E_n all of measure 1/2, with the property that the intersection of any subsequence has measure zero.

Now that you know which way to go (F vs. T), do you want me to spoil your fun, or do you want to keep looking? :)
 
Spoil my fun, please! This has been annoying me for too long, haha.
 
[tex]E_n = \{ x\in [0,1] : \sin(2^n\pi x)\ge0\}[/tex]

Equivalently, [tex]E_n[/tex] is the set of real numbers in [0,1] that have a binary expansion with 0 in the nth position.

[tex]E_n[/tex] is the disjoint union of [tex]2^{n-1}[/tex] intervals, each of length [tex]1/2^n[/tex]

Use the binary expansion idea to prove the intersection of any subsequence has measure zero.
 
Brilliant! Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K