Convergence properties of integrals

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence properties of integrals involving exponential functions and power series, specifically focusing on the integral of the form \(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-\phi^{2}/2} e^{-\lambda \phi^{4}/4!} d\phi\). Participants explore the validity of manipulating these integrals and series expansions, addressing issues of convergence and divergence.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the first integral is convergent while the second integral, after a Taylor expansion, is not convergent.
  • Others propose using Gamma functions as a potential method to resolve the convergence issue.
  • A participant questions the distinction between absolute convergence and conditional convergence, suggesting that the first series may be convergent while the second is not absolutely convergent.
  • It is noted that the individual integrals in the series may be infinite, leading to claims that expanding \(e^{-\phi^2/2}\) could be problematic.
  • Some participants argue that the original integral remains convergent despite the divergence of the series derived from it, raising questions about the validity of the Taylor expansion.
  • Concerns are expressed about the order of integration and summation, with a participant highlighting that changing this order may not be justified.
  • One participant proposes a method to prove that the series is asymptotic, suggesting the use of Stirling's approximation for large \(n\).
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of clarity in notation when discussing integrals and suggests improvements for better understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the convergence of the series and the validity of manipulating the integrals and series. While some assert that the original integral is convergent, others argue that the derived series are divergent. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the convergence properties.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the conditions under which the integrals and series converge or diverge, and there are mentions of potential limitations in the assumptions made during the discussion.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
It is perfectly fine to do the following:

##\displaystyle{\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\ d\phi\ e^{-\phi^{2}/2}e^{-\lambda \phi^{4}/4!} = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-\phi^{2}/2}\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}}\frac{(-\lambda\phi^{4})^{n}}{(4!)^{n}\ n!}=\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}\lambda^{n}}{(4!)^{n}n!}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-\phi^{2}/2}\phi^{4n}##

and then to continue with the integration, but the following is not valid:

##\displaystyle{\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\ d\phi\ e^{-\phi^{2}/2}\ \phi^{4n}=\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}d\phi\ \phi^{4n}\ \sum\limits_{m=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{m}\ \phi^{2m}}{2^{m}\ m!} = \sum\limits_{m=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{m}}{2^{m}\ m!} \int^{\infty}_{-\infty}d\phi\ \phi^{4n+2m}}##

The reason is that the integral after the Taylor expansion is not convergent, but it would be helpful if you could provide details.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
failexam said:
The reason is that the integral after the Taylor expansion is not convergent, but it would be helpful if you could provide details.

if you are interested in a way out to solve it one can proceed using Gamma functions
which has a form exp(-t) t^n.dt integrated from 0 to infinity..
 
Thanks for the help. I'll try it out.

But can you help me understand why my first integral is convergent but the second integral is not convergent?
 
It is not absolutely convergent, although it probably still converges.
 
Oh, so you mean that it's the first series (and not the integral) that is convergent, and that the second series is not absolutely convergent?
 
The final series is not convergent. The individual integrals are each infinite. Expanding e^{-\phi^2/2} is a bad idea.
 
Last edited:
Well, also the series in #1 is not convergent. You get
$$I_n=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{d} \phi \phi^{4n} \exp(-\phi^2/2)=2^{2n+1/2} \Gamma(2n+1/2).$$
The coefficients of the power series (with expansion parameter ##\lambda/24##) is
$$c_n=\frac{I_n}{n!}=\frac{(-1)^n 2^{2n+1/2}}{n!} \Gamma(2n+1/2).$$
The radius of convergence is
$$\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left |\frac{c_n}{c_{n+1}} \right|=\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{n+1}{16n^2+16n+1}=0.$$
Thas the series is divergent everywhere (except for ##\lambda=0## of course).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: spaghetti3451
vanhees71 said:
Well, also the series in #1 is not convergent. You get
$$I_n=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \mathrm{d} \phi \phi^{4n} \exp(-\phi^2/2)=2^{2n+1/2} \Gamma(2n+1/2).$$
The coefficients of the power series (with expansion parameter ##\lambda/24##) is
$$c_n=\frac{I_n}{n!}=\frac{(-1)^n 2^{2n+1/2}}{n!} \Gamma(2n+1/2).$$
The radius of convergence is
$$\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \left |\frac{c_n}{c_{n+1}} \right|=\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{n+1}{16n^2+16n+1}=0.$$
Thas the series is divergent everywhere (except for ##\lambda=0## of course).

Thanks! But if the original series ##\displaystyle{\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}\lambda^{n}}{(4!)^{n}n!}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-\phi^{2}/2}\phi^{4n}}## is divergent (except for ##\lambda=0##), does it make still make sense of talk about the integral ##\displaystyle{\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\ d\phi\ e^{-\phi^{2}/2}e^{-\lambda \phi^{4}/4!}}##?

My hunch is that it still makes sense to talk about this integral, because the Taylor expansion of the integral may not be correct, but the integral could still be a finite quantity.

mathman said:
The final series is not convergent. The individual integrals are each infinite. Expanding e^{-\phi^2/2} is a bad idea.

But, I don't see why the final series is not convergent - the individual integrals do appear to be finite. Consider the second line of my original post:

##\displaystyle{\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\ d\phi\ e^{-\phi^{2}/2}\ \phi^{4n}=\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}d\phi\ \phi^{4n}\ \sum\limits_{m=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{m}\ \phi^{2m}}{2^{m}\ m!} = \sum\limits_{m=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^{m}}{2^{m}\ m!} \int^{\infty}_{-\infty}d\phi\ \phi^{4n+2m}}##

Now,

##\displaystyle{\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}d\phi\ \phi^{4n+2m}=\frac{1}{4n+2m+1}{[\phi^{4n+2m+1}]}^{\infty}_{-\infty}}=0##,

because the fields vanish at infinity!

Where's my mistake here?
 
This integral is of course simply divergent. The original integral is of course convergent and can be easily solved by numerical integration.
 
  • #10
I don't see why the integral is divergent.

After all, I get ##0## for each of the integrals.
 
  • #11
What's ##\infty^n##?
 
  • #12
Right! My bad!
 
  • #13
So, this means that every series is divergent, except for the original integral, which is convergent.

But the first series is an asymptotic series expansion of the original integral, is it not?

You have clearly shown to me that the first series is not convergent, but how do you prove that the series is asymptotic?
 
  • #14
I don't know, why you are surprised. Why should the series be convergent only because the integral is convergent? Note that you tacitly change the order of integration and series summation, which is not always allowed!
 
  • #15
vanhees71 said:
I don't know, why you are surprised. Why should the series be convergent only because the integral is convergent? Note that you tacitly change the order of integration and series summation, which is not always allowed!

Ah, I see!I think I have a way to prove that the series is asymptotic.

From before,

##Z(\lambda)=\displaystyle{\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\ d\phi\ e^{-\phi^{2}/2}e^{-\lambda \phi^{4}/4!} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\phi\ e^{-\phi^{2}/2}\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}}\frac{(-\lambda\phi^{4})^{n}}{(4!)^{n}\ n!}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}\lambda^{n}}{(4!)^{n}n!}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}d\phi\ e^{-\phi^{2}/2}\phi^{4n}##

so that, after integration (which you have already done), we have

##Z(\lambda)=\displaystyle{\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}\lambda^{n}}{(4!)^{n}n!}(2)^{n+\frac{1}{2}}\Gamma(2n+\frac{1}{2})=\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}(4n-1)!}{(4!)^{n}n!}\lambda^{n}=\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}(4n)!}{(4!)^{n}n!4^{n}(2n)!}\lambda^{n}}##

(This is all taken from the previous posts except the last two expressions which are my own simplifcation.)

So, the asymptotic series is ##\displaystyle{Z(\lambda)=\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}c_{n}\lambda^{n}}##, where ##\displaystyle{c_{n}=\frac{(-1)^{n}(4n)!}{(4!)^{n}n!4^{n}(2n)!}}##.My idea is to use the method of stationary points to show that, for a fixed value of ##\lambda##, the size of the successive terms decrease until they increase again. To accomplish this task, I will need to differentiate ##c_n## with respect to ##n##, set it to ##0## and show that the equation has a solution for a finite value of ##n##.

To make the differentiation easy, I plan to use Stirling's approximation to find the asymptotic form of the ##c_n## for large ##n##. My hunch is that the stationary value of ##n## is large (in which case Stirling's approximation is valid).

What do you think?
 
Last edited:
  • #16
I would find the original post much clearer if it used parentheses so that I know exactly what is supposed to be under the integral sign and what is not. In the same vein, it's a good idea to always use dϕ when writing an integral with respect to ϕ (or whatever the dummy variable is) — this seems to have been omitted in several terms. Finally, modern notation places the dϕ after the integrand (the expression being integrated), not before the integrand as in the past.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K