Conversion from CO2 to Air flowrates

  • Thread starter Thread starter redargon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Co2
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on converting air flowrate measurements from a digital flowmeter to CO2 flowrate measurements. The formula provided for conversion is F2 = F1 * (S1/S2)^0.5, where F1 is the measured flowrate, S1 is the specific gravity of air, and S2 is the specific gravity of CO2. The specific gravity of air is 1, while that of CO2 is 1.57, resulting in an actual flowrate of approximately 80.9 SL/min when 100 SL/min is measured. The discussion also highlights the impact of temperature, pressure, and compressibility factors on the accuracy of the conversion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of flowrate measurement units (SL/min)
  • Knowledge of specific gravity and density concepts
  • Familiarity with gas behavior under varying temperature and pressure conditions
  • Basic mathematical skills for applying conversion formulas
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of temperature and pressure on gas flow measurements
  • Learn about compressibility factors for gases, particularly CO2
  • Explore calibration techniques for digital flowmeters
  • Investigate the differences between digital flowmeters and float gauge flowmeters
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, technicians, and researchers involved in gas flow measurement and calibration, particularly those working with CO2 and air flowrates.

redargon
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure under which section this should go, but the application is engineering. I have a calibration problem that I'm trying to figure out:

I have a digital flowmeter that measures the flowrate of air and gives a SL/min (litres/minute at stansard conditions) value. The thing is I want to measure the flowrate of CO2 with that same device (it takes too long to acquire one that is set up for CO2). Is there a conversion factor I can use to convert SL/min (air) into SL/min (CO2)?

I tried ratios of densities and also molar masses, but I don't get a result that looks reasonable.

Any ideas?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A density ratio really should work: CO2 is denser than air, so it should give readings higher than actual.
 
Should be:

F2 = F1 * (S1/S2).5

Where:

F1 = Flowrate measured by device
F2 = Actual flow rate
S1 = Specific gravity flow meter is calibrated for
S2 = Specific gravity of gas going through meter

For example. You measure 100 SL/min on your meter which is calibrated for air. Specific gravity for air is 1. Specific gravity of CO2 is 1.57. Actual flow is 80.9 SL/min.

Edit for clarification:
The flow meter is calibrated for air at a specific temperature and pressure. The above assumes it's calibrated for standard conditions.

Also, the above could also be rewritten using densities for the gasses instead of specific gravity. Just replace density for S1 and S2 since specific gravity is nothing more than the ratio of density to air at standard conditions.
 
Last edited:
Q_Goest said:
Should be:

F2 = F1 * (S1/S2).5

Where:

F1 = Flowrate measured by device
F2 = Actual flow rate
S1 = Specific gravity flow meter is calibrated for
S2 = Specific gravity of gas going through meter

For example. You measure 100 SL/min on your meter which is calibrated for air. Specific gravity for air is 1. Specific gravity of CO2 is 1.57. Actual flow is 80.9 SL/min.

Edit for clarification:
The flow meter is calibrated for air at a specific temperature and pressure. The above assumes it's calibrated for standard conditions.

Also, the above could also be rewritten using densities for the gasses instead of specific gravity. Just replace density for S1 and S2 since specific gravity is nothing more than the ratio of density to air at standard conditions.

Ok, that's what I got too. I knew I was on the right path. The experimental data I have so far is telling me (comparing the digital air flow meter to a float gauge CO2 flow meter) that the conversion factor is closer to 1.2, but I attribute this to the temperature and pressure. The CO2 is from a small cartridge and cools considerably as it expands, also th pressure to drive the flow is around 1 barg. Ok, I think I can find something, or at least get a close enough estimate. I should probably consider compressibility factors.

Thanks, as always, for the quick and thorough replies.
 
Is there a mistake in the calculation?

F2 = 100 * (1/1.57)^.5 = 79.80

so F2 does not equal 80.9?
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K