Conversion of units (tangential velocity)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of tangential velocity from kilometers per second (km/s) to a formula involving parsecs and arcseconds. The user initially calculates tangential speed using the formula V_t = μ . d, where V_t is the tangential speed, d is the distance, and μ is in radians per second. The user encounters confusion when converting units, particularly when transitioning from kilometers to parsecs and radians to arcseconds. The correct conversion yields V_t = 0.21μ . d, indicating that careful attention to unit conversions is crucial for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tangential velocity and its formula
  • Familiarity with unit conversions, specifically between kilometers, parsecs, radians, and arcseconds
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations and units
  • Knowledge of time conversions (days to years) for accurate calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study unit conversion techniques in physics, focusing on angular measurements
  • Learn about the relationship between different astronomical units, such as parsecs and kilometers
  • Explore the concept of tangential velocity in circular motion
  • Review dimensional analysis to ensure unit consistency in calculations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, physics enthusiasts, and anyone involved in calculations of tangential velocity and unit conversions in astrophysics.

rbnphlp
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
This should be very easy but I can't see what I am doing wrong...

V_t=\mu .d where vt = tangential speed (in km/s)
d = distance (in km)
mu(radian/sec)

Now by converting I should get

V_t=4.74\mu .d
vt = tangential speed (in km/s)
d = distance (in parsec)
mu(arcsec/yr)

but according to my working ,
V_t=\frac{206264\times 365 \times 24 \times 3600}{3.086 \times 10^{13}}

which comes to be V_t=.21\mu .d

I know inverting the above fractions will lead me to the answer but I can't see why ?:(

1parsec=3.086*10^13 km
1 radian=206264 arcsec

Thanks ..
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It would help if you described the original problem.
 
If you were to attach your conversion units to the numbers you have, (ie 365 day/yr) then do all of the algebra in units I think you will find your problem.

Note that after completing the conversion the units of the resulting velocity will NOT be in km/s.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
8K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K