Convert f(x) to parametric holding something constant

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around converting a particle's path described by the equation y=4x² into a parametric form while maintaining a constant velocity of 5 m/s. Participants explore various approaches to derive the parametric equations and address the challenges encountered in the process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the initial problem and attempts to derive a parametric equation but finds that the velocity does not match the required constant value.
  • Another participant suggests letting x be a function of time and implies that integrating the velocity should yield a constant value, hinting at a solution.
  • A different participant expresses confusion regarding the integration process and attempts to manipulate the equations but does not arrive at a satisfactory result.
  • One participant critiques the integration approach, emphasizing that x is a function of t and provides a more detailed formulation of the length differential equation.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on how to solve for f(x) from the expressions involving f(t).
  • A later reply points out typographical errors in previous posts and offers an alternative method to solve the problem, detailing the steps involved in deriving the equations but notes that the final equation cannot be solved analytically for z.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the help but notes the age of the thread, implying a lack of ongoing engagement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct method to derive the parametric equations. Multiple competing views and approaches are presented, with some participants expressing confusion and others providing corrections or alternative methods.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the integration process and the relationship between x and t. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding and interpretation of the problem.

ChickenChakuro
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hi all, if I have a problem like:

The path of a particle is described by [tex]y=4x^2[/tex], and it has a constant velocity of 5 m/s.

How do I make a parametric equation out of this?

I tried doing:
[tex]r = xi + f(x)j[/tex]
[tex]r = ti + 4t^2j[/tex],

but then [tex]v = \frac{dr}{dt} = i + 8tj[/tex], so [tex]|v|=\sqrt{1+64t^2}[/tex], and at, for example, time [tex]t = 0[/tex], [tex]|v| = \sqrt{1+0} = 1[/tex], not the constant 5 m/s! Anyone know how I can make a parametric equation that will work?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So you have y = 4x2 and |v(t)| = 5 (and v(t) > 0)

Letting x = (x(t),y(t))

You know that dv/dt = x

So you know that:

| integral(x,dt) | = 5

Think about it for a bit, sure it will come to you :smile:
 
I don't get it!

I tried:

[tex]|(\int x\,dt)| = 5[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{(xt)^2+C^2}= 5[/tex]

[tex]x^2t^2+C^2=25[/tex]

It doesn't seem to work! When x = 0, C=5, so
[tex]|v| = x^2t^2 +5[/tex]?
 
Last edited:
Then length is NOT [itex]| \int x dx|[/itex]! Also, x is itself a function of t so your integration is wrong.

If x= f(t) and y= g(t) then since y= 4x2, g(t)= 4(f(t)2 so
[tex]\frac{dg}{dt}= 8f(t)\frac{df}{dt}[/tex]
The length f(t)i+ g(t)j is
[tex]\sqrt{f^2(t)+ 64f^2(t)\left(\frac{df}{dt}\right)^2}= 5[/tex]
Solve that differential equation for f(x) and then find g(x).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, thanks. Wait, how do I solve for f(x)? All I see is f(t)!
 
Ah, nevermind. Thanks for the help!
 


There appear to be typographic mistakes in post 4. For example,

[tex]\sqrt{f^2(t)+64f^2(t)\left(\frac{df}{dt}\right)^2}\;=\:5\quad\ \ \mbox{should instead be}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{\left(\frac{df}{dt}\right)^2+64f^2(t)\left(\frac{df}{dt}\right)^2}=\:5.[/tex]​

I would instead solve the given problem in post 1 as follows.

Given y = 4*x2, ds/dt = 5 m/s. At x = 0, t = 0.

[tex]\mathbf{\vec s}=x\,\mathbf{i}+y\,\mathbf{j}[/tex]

[tex]d\mathbf{\vec s}=dx\,\mathbf{i}+dy\,\mathbf{j}[/tex]

[tex]ds=[(dx)^2+(dy)^2]^{0.5}[/tex]​

[tex]\mbox{But since }y=4x^2,\ \ \therefore \ dy=8x\,dx.\ \mbox{Therefore,}[/tex]

[tex]\begin{equation*}\begin{split}ds&=[(dx)^2+64x^2(dx)^2]^{0.5}\\<br /> &=(1+64x^2)^{0.5}\,dx\end{equation*}\end{split}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{ds}{dt}=(1+64x^2)^{0.5}\,\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]​

[tex]\mbox{But }\frac{ds}{dt}=5\ \mbox{m/s}.[/tex]

[tex]5=(1+64x^2)^{0.5}\,\frac{dx}{dt}[/tex]

[tex]\begin{equation*}\begin{split}dt&=\frac{1}{5}(1+64x^2)^{0.5}\,dx\\<br /> &=\frac{8}{5}(\frac{1}{64}+x^2)^{0.5}\,dx\\<br /> &=\frac{8}{5}[\left(\frac{1}{8}\right)^2+x^2]^{0.5}\,dx\end{equation*}\end{split}[/tex]

[tex]\int dt=\frac{8}{5}\int[\left(\frac{1}{8}\right)^2+x^2]^{0.5}\,dx[/tex]

[tex]t=\frac{8}{5}\int[\left(\frac{1}{8}\right)^2+x^2]^{0.5}\,dx[/tex]​

Therefore, from any integral table,

[tex]t\:=\:\frac{4}{5}x\,(\frac{1}{64}+x^2)^{0.5}\ +\ \frac{1}{128}\ln|x+(\frac{1}{64}+x^2)^{0.5}|\ +\ c[/tex]​

[tex]\mbox{At}\ x=0,\ t=0;\ \ \therefore \ c=-\frac{1}{128}\ln(\frac{1}{8}).[/tex]

[tex]\mbox{Now, let }\:x=\frac{1}{8}\sinh z.\ \ \mbox{Therefore,}[/tex]

[tex]\begin{equation*}\begin{split}t\:&=\:\frac{1}{10}(\sinh z)(\frac{1}{64}+\frac{1}{64}\sinh^2z)^{0.5}\ \\<br /> &+\ \frac{1}{128}\ln\left[\frac{1}{8}\sinh z+(\frac{1}{64}+\frac{1}{64}\sinh^2z)^{0.5}\right]\ -\ \frac{1}{128}\ln(\frac{1}{8})\\<br /> &=\:\frac{1}{80}(\sinh z)(1+\sinh^2z)^{0.5}\ \\<br /> &+\ \frac{1}{128}\ln\left(\frac{1}{8}[\sinh z+(1+\sinh^2z)^{0.5}]\right)\ -\ \frac{1}{128}\ln(\frac{1}{8})\\<br /> &=\:\frac{1}{80}(\sinh z)(\cosh z)\ +\ \frac{1}{128}\ln\left[\frac{1}{8}(\sinh z+\cosh z)\right]\ -\ \frac{1}{128}\ln(\frac{1}{8})\\<br /> &=\:\frac{1}{80}(\sinh z)(\cosh z)\ +\ \frac{1}{128}\ln(\frac{1}{8}\,e^z)\ -\ \frac{1}{128}\ln(\frac{1}{8})\\<br /> &=\:\frac{1}{80}(\sinh z)(\cosh z)\ +\ \frac{1}{128}\ln(\frac{1}{8})\ +\ \frac{1}{128}\ln(e^z)\ -\ \frac{1}{128}\ln(\frac{1}{8})\\<br /> &=\:\frac{1}{80}(\sinh z)(\cosh z)\ +\ \frac{1}{128}\,z\\<br /> &=\:\frac{1}{160}\sinh(2z)\;+\;\frac{1}{128}\,z\end{split}\end{equation*}[/tex]​


Unfortunately, this equation cannot be solved analytically for z (to my knowledge). But you could solve it for z numerically, for any given value of t. And then you can compute the corresponding value of x and y, because x = 0.125*sinh(z), and y = 4*x2.
 
Thanks, but this thread was 4 years old!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K