Converting arbitrary Cartesian vector to cylindrical

Click For Summary
To convert a Cartesian vector V={Vx,Vy,Vz} to cylindrical coordinates, the process involves transforming the x and y components into polar coordinates while keeping the z component unchanged. Specifically, the conversion formulas are r = √(Vx² + Vy²) for the radial distance and θ = arctan(Vy/Vx) for the angular component. If Vz is zero, it remains zero in cylindrical coordinates, confirming that the z-axis does not affect the transformation. The discussion emphasizes understanding that cylindrical coordinates extend polar coordinates into three dimensions. This conversion is essential for applications involving cylindrical geometries.
playoff
Messages
80
Reaction score
1
Hello PF, I have a problem to solve in the following form: Given a vector with Cartesian components, V={Vx,Vy,Vz}, find its components in circular cylindrical coordinate.

Given the actual vector components, it'd be very easy to convert. But I have no idea where to start on this. Any guide to where to start from will be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the z component were zero then what kind conversion would it be?
 
Well, its a cylindrical coordinate, so Vz wouldn't go over any transformation, right? So if Vz=0, then after the conversion it will still be 0. I am still very lost...
 
I was hoping you'd recognize it as a conversion from x,y to polar coordinates. Cylindrical are an extension of polar to 3D by adding the z component.
 
There are probably loads of proofs of this online, but I do not want to cheat. Here is my attempt: Convexity says that $$f(\lambda a + (1-\lambda)b) \leq \lambda f(a) + (1-\lambda) f(b)$$ $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (f(a) - f(b))$$ We know from the intermediate value theorem that there exists a ##c \in (b,a)## such that $$\frac{f(a) - f(b)}{a-b} = f'(c).$$ Hence $$f(b + \lambda(a-b)) \leq f(b) + \lambda (a - b) f'(c))$$ $$\frac{f(b + \lambda(a-b)) - f(b)}{\lambda(a-b)}...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
19K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K