Converting Spherical to Cylindrical Coordinates for a Velocity Expression

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting an expression from spherical coordinates to cylindrical coordinates, specifically focusing on a velocity expression involving variables such as \( v \), \( \theta \), and \( \phi \). The original poster, Niles, is trying to express the given function in terms of radial and axial velocities \( v_r \) and \( v_z \), while also addressing the integration of angles and the implications of the coordinate transformation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Niles initially attempts to integrate out the angles \( \theta \) and \( \phi \) but encounters issues with the integral over \( \theta \) yielding zero. This leads to questions about the correctness of the approach. Later, he considers using relationships between spherical and cylindrical coordinates to reformulate the expression but expresses uncertainty about achieving the desired results.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some providing clarifications on the relationships between spherical and cylindrical coordinates. Niles has shifted his approach based on feedback and is exploring how to incorporate density into the conversion. There is a collaborative effort to clarify the mathematical relationships involved, although no consensus has been reached on the final form of the expression.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the conventions used in spherical and cylindrical coordinates, including the definitions of angles and the limits of integration. Niles is also navigating the implications of these conventions on the transformation process.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

I have an expression on the form
[tex] df(v, \theta, \phi) = v e^{-v^2/C}\cos(\theta)v^2\sin(\theta)\,dv\,d\theta\,d\phi[/tex]
and I am trying to write it in cylindrical coordinates. Note that θ runs from 0..π, v is a velocity and C a real constant. So I wish to write it in terms of a radial and axial velocity, vr and vz.

First I thought of integrating out θ and [itex]\phi[/itex]. [itex]\phi[/itex] is easily done, and it yields 2π. However, the integral over θ yields 0. Am I doing this wrong?

The result should yield something proportional to

[tex] v_re^{-v_r^2/C^2}v_ze^{-v_z^2/C^2}\,dv_r\,dv_z[/tex]Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In spherical coordinates the integral over theta runs 0 to pi.
 
Hi

Thanks for replying. The integral of cos(theta)sin(theta) over 0..pi gives 0.
 
Oh, right. I looked at the sin(theta) and didn't see the other term.
 
OK, I am taking a different approach now. Now I use [itex]v_r = v\cos(\theta)[/itex] and [itex]v_z = v\sin(\theta)[/itex]. This gives me
[tex] v_rv_zv\,dv\,d\theta[/tex]
Then I use (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_coordinate_system) that [itex]\arctan(v_r/v_z)[/itex] and [itex]v=\sqrt(v_r^2+v_z^2)[/itex] to find dv/dvr and dθ/dvz. However, don't get the desired results.

Is my approach wrong?


Niles.
 
Basically, what you're trying to do is express a complete sphere with radius = v, in terms of cylindrical coordinates, with density [itex]v e^{-v^2/C}\cos(\theta)[/itex]. So, forget about the density for now, and focus on the conversion to cylindrical coordinates. Afterwards, plug in the density.
 
Thanks for taking the time to help me. For the conversion I get
[tex] v e^{-v^2/C}\cos(\theta)v^2\sin(\theta) = v_rv_zv e^{-\sqrt{v_r^2+v_z^2}/C}[/tex]
I have used the relations I linked to above. Can I get a hint to how I should take care of the density?

Best wishes,
Niles.
 
Ahh, I think I get it now. So what you mean is that
[tex] v\,dvd\theta = dv_r\,dv_z[/tex]

Then it adds up!
 
In cylindrical coordinates r measures the distance from the origin to the foot of the projection from the point to the xy-plane. The line from the origin to the point in 3 dimensions, the line from the origin to the point at the foot of the projection and the projection form a straight line with hypotenuse of length [itex]\rho[/itex], angle [itex]\pi/2- \phi[/itex], "opposite side" of length z, and "near side" of length r. That is, the point that has spherical coordinates [itex]\rho[/itex], [itex]\theta[/itex], and [itex]\phi[/itex] has cylindrical coordinates [itex]r= \rho sin(\phi)[/itex], [itex]\theta= \theta[/itex] and [itex]z= \rho cos(\phi)[/itex].

Here, I have used the mathematics convention that [itex]\theta[/itex] is the "longitude" and [itex]\phi[/itex] is the "co-latitude". The physics convention reverses that.
 
  • #10
My understanding of the problem is in the attached graph below.
In this problem, [itex]\phi[/itex] is substituted by [itex]\theta[/itex], [itex]\theta[/itex] is replaced by [itex]\phi[/itex], and [itex]\rho[/itex] is replaced by v.

So, a description of the sphere would be:
For [itex]\phi[/itex] and [itex]\theta[/itex] fixed, [itex]v[/itex] varies from 0 to v.
For [itex]\phi[/itex] fixed, [itex]\theta[/itex] varies from 0 to ∏.
[itex]\phi[/itex] varies from 0 to 2∏.

The corresponding description in terms of cylindrical coordinates would be:
For [itex]\phi[/itex] and [itex]r[/itex] fixed, [itex]z[/itex] varies from [itex]-\sqrt{v^2-v^2\sin^2\theta}[/itex] to [itex]\sqrt{v^2-v^2\sin^2\theta}[/itex], where [itex]\theta[/itex] is [itex]\arctan ({\frac {r}{z}})[/itex].
For [itex]\phi[/itex] fixed, [itex]r[/itex] varies from 0 to v.
[itex]\phi[/itex] varies from 0 to 2∏.

For the integrand:
[tex]v e^{-v^2/C}\cos(\theta)[/tex]Replace [itex]\theta[/itex] by [itex]\arctan ({\frac {r}{z}})[/itex] and [itex]v[/itex] by [itex]\sqrt{r^2+z^2}[/itex].
 

Attachments

  • spherical.PNG
    spherical.PNG
    16 KB · Views: 439
Last edited:
  • #11
Thanks for the help, both of you.Niles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K