Coordinate transformation into a standard flat metric

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on transforming the metric from a non-standard form to the standard flat metric using coordinate transformations. The initial approach involved expanding the differentials using the chain rule and attempting to match coefficients in the metric equation. A successful transformation was eventually found with the relations x = Xcosh(T) and t = Xsinh(T), although the user sought a more straightforward method. The discussion also highlights the importance of null geodesics in determining the appropriate coordinate changes. Ultimately, the transformation process is clarified through the use of hyperbolic functions and the relationship between mixed partial derivatives.
offscene
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Starting from the metric ##ds^2=-X^2dT^2+dX^2##, using a coordinate transformation of T and X to t and x, convert it to the form ds^2=-dt^2+dx^2 (standard flat 2D metric).
Relevant Equations
Not actually a homework problem ("confession" from example 7.3 in Hartle's book for Gravity and GR) and no other relevant equations I can think of besides the standard chain rule but thought that this was the most fitting place to ask.
I started by expanding ##dx## and ##dt## using chain rule:

$$dt = \frac{dt}{dX}dX+\frac{dt}{dT}dT$$
$$dx = \frac{dx}{dX}dX+\frac{dx}{dT}dT$$

and then expressing ##ds^2## as such:

$$ds^2 = \left(\left(\frac{dt}{dX}\right)^2+\left(\frac{dt}{dX}\right)^2\right)dX^2+\left(\left(\frac{dt}{dT}\right)^2+\left(\frac{dt}{dT}\right)^2\right)dT^2 + 2\left(\frac{dt}{dX}\frac{dt}{dT}+\frac{dx}{dT}\frac{dx}{dX}\right)$$

But after matching the coefficients to the original ##ds^2##, I am unable to solve the equations to come up with the right transformation and was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction/show me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I found the transformation with ##x = X\cosh(T)## and ##t = X\sinh(T)## with some guess and check but is there a cleaner way to do this?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PeroK
The null geodesics in the usual Minkowski coordinates are given by ##x\pm t = const##. You can find them in the given coordinates and use that to set the coordinate change that matches them. In your case the null curves are given by ##dX^2=X^2dT^2##, which can be solved easily and gives ##Xe^{\pm T} = const## (you don't have to check that these are geodesics, if the change of variables works). So setting ##x+t = Xe^T## and ##x-t = Xe^{-T}## gives you the ones you found.
 
  • Like
Likes offscene and TSny
offscene said:
Homework Statement:: Starting from the metric ##ds^2=-X^2dT^2+dX^2##, using a coordinate transformation of T and X to t and x, convert it to the form ds^2=-dt^2+dx^2 (standard flat 2D metric).
Relevant Equations:: Not actually a homework problem ("confession" from example 7.3 in Hartle's book for Gravity and GR) and no other relevant equations I can think of besides the standard chain rule but thought that this was the most fitting place to ask.

I started by expanding ##dx## and ##dt## using chain rule:

But after matching the coefficients to the original ##ds^2##, I am unable to solve the equations to come up with the right transformation and was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction/show me.

Using the chain rule in ds^2 = -dt^2 + dx^2 = -X^2 dT^2 + dX^2 you should find <br /> \begin{split}<br /> \left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial X}\right)^2 - \left(\frac{\partial t}{\partial X}\right)^2 &amp;= 1 \\<br /> \left(\frac{\partial t}{\partial T}\right)^2 - \left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial T}\right)^2 &amp;= X^2 \\<br /> \frac{\partial t}{\partial X}\frac{\partial t}{\partial T} - \frac{\partial x}{\partial T}\frac{\partial x}{\partial X} &amp;= 0\end{split} Now the first two equations are satisfied by setting <br /> \begin{split}<br /> \frac{\partial x}{\partial X} = \cosh \zeta \quad \frac{\partial t}{\partial X} &amp;= \sinh \zeta \\<br /> \frac{\partial t}{\partial T} = X\cosh \eta \quad \frac{\partial x}{\partial T} &amp;= X\sinh \eta \end{split}<br /> due to the identify \cosh^2 u - \sinh^2 u = 1. At present \eta and \zeta are unknown functions of X and T, but the third equation gives <br /> X (\sinh \zeta \cosh \eta - \cosh \zeta \sinh \eta) = X \sinh(\zeta - \eta) = 0 so that \zeta = \eta. The problem is now reduced to finding \eta. We can either find by inspection that \eta = T will work, or we can use equality of mixed partials to find that <br /> \begin{split}<br /> \frac{\partial^2 t}{\partial X\,\partial T} - \frac{\partial^2 t}{\partial T\,\partial X} = <br /> \left(1 - \frac{\partial \eta}{\partial T}\right) \sinh \eta + X\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial X} \cosh \eta &amp;= 0 \\<br /> \frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial X\,\partial T} - \frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial T\,\partial X} = <br /> \left(1 - \frac{\partial \eta}{\partial T}\right) \cosh \eta + X\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial X} \sinh \eta &amp;= 0<br /> \end{split} and solving for the partial derivatives we find <br /> 1 - \frac{\partial \eta}{\partial T} = 0 = X\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial X}.
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...