Coordinate transformation into a standard flat metric

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the coordinate transformation from the metric \( ds^2 = -X^2 dT^2 + dX^2 \) to the standard flat metric \( ds^2 = -dt^2 + dx^2 \). The transformation is achieved using the relationships \( x = X \cosh(T) \) and \( t = X \sinh(T) \). Participants highlight the use of the chain rule to derive the necessary equations and emphasize the importance of matching coefficients to solve for the transformation. The discussion concludes with a method for confirming the validity of the transformation through the identification of null geodesics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry and metrics
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus
  • Knowledge of hyperbolic functions, specifically \( \sinh \) and \( \cosh \)
  • Basic concepts of geodesics in general relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of geodesics in Minkowski space
  • Learn about coordinate transformations in general relativity
  • Explore the implications of hyperbolic functions in physics
  • Investigate the use of the chain rule in higher-dimensional metrics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on general relativity and differential geometry, will benefit from this discussion. It is also valuable for mathematicians interested in the application of calculus to physics.

offscene
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Starting from the metric ##ds^2=-X^2dT^2+dX^2##, using a coordinate transformation of T and X to t and x, convert it to the form ds^2=-dt^2+dx^2 (standard flat 2D metric).
Relevant Equations
Not actually a homework problem ("confession" from example 7.3 in Hartle's book for Gravity and GR) and no other relevant equations I can think of besides the standard chain rule but thought that this was the most fitting place to ask.
I started by expanding ##dx## and ##dt## using chain rule:

$$dt = \frac{dt}{dX}dX+\frac{dt}{dT}dT$$
$$dx = \frac{dx}{dX}dX+\frac{dx}{dT}dT$$

and then expressing ##ds^2## as such:

$$ds^2 = \left(\left(\frac{dt}{dX}\right)^2+\left(\frac{dt}{dX}\right)^2\right)dX^2+\left(\left(\frac{dt}{dT}\right)^2+\left(\frac{dt}{dT}\right)^2\right)dT^2 + 2\left(\frac{dt}{dX}\frac{dt}{dT}+\frac{dx}{dT}\frac{dx}{dX}\right)$$

But after matching the coefficients to the original ##ds^2##, I am unable to solve the equations to come up with the right transformation and was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction/show me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind, I found the transformation with ##x = X\cosh(T)## and ##t = X\sinh(T)## with some guess and check but is there a cleaner way to do this?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and PeroK
The null geodesics in the usual Minkowski coordinates are given by ##x\pm t = const##. You can find them in the given coordinates and use that to set the coordinate change that matches them. In your case the null curves are given by ##dX^2=X^2dT^2##, which can be solved easily and gives ##Xe^{\pm T} = const## (you don't have to check that these are geodesics, if the change of variables works). So setting ##x+t = Xe^T## and ##x-t = Xe^{-T}## gives you the ones you found.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: offscene and TSny
offscene said:
Homework Statement:: Starting from the metric ##ds^2=-X^2dT^2+dX^2##, using a coordinate transformation of T and X to t and x, convert it to the form ds^2=-dt^2+dx^2 (standard flat 2D metric).
Relevant Equations:: Not actually a homework problem ("confession" from example 7.3 in Hartle's book for Gravity and GR) and no other relevant equations I can think of besides the standard chain rule but thought that this was the most fitting place to ask.

I started by expanding ##dx## and ##dt## using chain rule:

But after matching the coefficients to the original ##ds^2##, I am unable to solve the equations to come up with the right transformation and was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction/show me.

Using the chain rule in ds^2 = -dt^2 + dx^2 = -X^2 dT^2 + dX^2 you should find <br /> \begin{split}<br /> \left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial X}\right)^2 - \left(\frac{\partial t}{\partial X}\right)^2 &amp;= 1 \\<br /> \left(\frac{\partial t}{\partial T}\right)^2 - \left(\frac{\partial x}{\partial T}\right)^2 &amp;= X^2 \\<br /> \frac{\partial t}{\partial X}\frac{\partial t}{\partial T} - \frac{\partial x}{\partial T}\frac{\partial x}{\partial X} &amp;= 0\end{split} Now the first two equations are satisfied by setting <br /> \begin{split}<br /> \frac{\partial x}{\partial X} = \cosh \zeta \quad \frac{\partial t}{\partial X} &amp;= \sinh \zeta \\<br /> \frac{\partial t}{\partial T} = X\cosh \eta \quad \frac{\partial x}{\partial T} &amp;= X\sinh \eta \end{split}<br /> due to the identify \cosh^2 u - \sinh^2 u = 1. At present \eta and \zeta are unknown functions of X and T, but the third equation gives <br /> X (\sinh \zeta \cosh \eta - \cosh \zeta \sinh \eta) = X \sinh(\zeta - \eta) = 0 so that \zeta = \eta. The problem is now reduced to finding \eta. We can either find by inspection that \eta = T will work, or we can use equality of mixed partials to find that <br /> \begin{split}<br /> \frac{\partial^2 t}{\partial X\,\partial T} - \frac{\partial^2 t}{\partial T\,\partial X} = <br /> \left(1 - \frac{\partial \eta}{\partial T}\right) \sinh \eta + X\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial X} \cosh \eta &amp;= 0 \\<br /> \frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial X\,\partial T} - \frac{\partial^2 x}{\partial T\,\partial X} = <br /> \left(1 - \frac{\partial \eta}{\partial T}\right) \cosh \eta + X\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial X} \sinh \eta &amp;= 0<br /> \end{split} and solving for the partial derivatives we find <br /> 1 - \frac{\partial \eta}{\partial T} = 0 = X\frac{\partial \eta}{\partial X}.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: offscene

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
924
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K