Coordinate transformation of a tensor in 2 dimensions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the coordinate transformation of a symmetric tensor \( T_{\mu\nu} \) in a two-dimensional flat Euclidean plane using complex coordinates \( z = x + iy \) and \( \overline{z} = x - iy \). The transformed tensor components are derived as \( T_{zz} = \frac{1}{4}(T_{00} - 2iT_{10} - T_{11}) \), \( T_{\overline{z}\overline{z}} = \frac{1}{4}(T_{00} + 2iT_{10} - T_{11}) \), and \( T_{\overline{z}z} = T_{z\overline{z}} = \frac{1}{4}(T_{00} + T_{11}) \). The transformation matrix \( U \) is identified as \( \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{2} & \frac{-i}{2} \\ \frac{1}{2} & \frac{i}{2} \end{pmatrix} \), which is crucial for correctly transforming the tensor components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of symmetric tensors and their properties
  • Familiarity with coordinate transformations in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their applications in physics
  • Proficiency in tensor notation and manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of tensor transformations in different coordinate systems
  • Learn about the properties of symmetric tensors in higher dimensions
  • Explore the application of complex coordinates in physics, particularly in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of transformation matrices in tensor calculus
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students specializing in tensor analysis, particularly those working with complex coordinates and transformations in theoretical physics.

physicus
Messages
52
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Given a symmetric tensor T_{\mu\nu} on the flat Euclidean plane (g_{\mu\nu}=\delta_{\mu\nu}), we want to change to complex coordinates z=x+iy, \,\overline{z}=x-iy.
Show, that the components of the tensor in this basis are given by:
T_{zz}=\frac{1}{4}(T_{00}-2iT_{10}-T_{11}),\, T_{\overline{z}\overline{z}}=\frac{1}{4}(T_{00}+2iT_{10}-T_{11}),\, T_{\overline{z}z}=T_{z\overline{z}}=\frac{1}{4}(T_{00}+T_{11})


Homework Equations


T_{\mu\nu}=T_{\nu\mu}
T'_{\alpha\beta} = U_{\alpha}{}^{\mu}U_{\beta}{}^{\nu}T_{\mu\nu}


The Attempt at a Solution


In priciple, this should be an easy linear algebra problem. I just don't get the right result.
I use T'for the tensor in the new coordinates. Then, there should be a transformation matrix U, s.t.
T'_{\alpha\beta} = U_{\alpha}{}^{\mu}U_{\beta}{}^{\nu}T_{\mu\nu}
But what is U? Neiter with the transformation matrix from the new to the old coordinates \begin{pmatrix}1 & 1 \\ i & -i\end{pmatrix} nor with the transformation matrix from the old to the new coordinates \begin{pmatrix}\frac{1}{2} & \frac{-i}{2} \\ \frac{1}{2} & \frac{i}{2} \end{pmatrix} it is working. What am I doing wrong?

physicus
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's difficult to say without seeing the calculation. You do remember that there are two transformation matrices, right? (one for each index)
 
Thanks, but I still get a wrong result.

The matrix U = \begin{pmatrix}\frac{1}{2} & \frac{-i}{2} \\ \frac{1}{2} & \frac{i}{2} \end{pmatrix} transforms from the old basis x,y to the new basis z=x+iy, \overline{z}=x-iy.
The original metrix is g_{\mu\nu}=\delta_{\mu\nu}. The transformed metric is g'_{\mu\nu}=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & \frac{1}{2} \\ \frac{1}{2} & 0 \end{pmatrix}
Therefore, the tensor in the new basis is given by
T'^{\alpha}{}_\beta = U^{\alpha}{}_\mu T^{\mu}{}_\nu (U^{-1})^\nu{}_\beta = \begin{pmatrix}\frac{1}{2}T^0{}_0+\frac{1}{2}T^1{}_1 & \frac{1}{2}T^0{}_0-\frac{i}{2}T^0{}_1- {\frac{i}{2}}T^1{}_0-T^1{}_1 \\ \frac{1}{2}T^0{}_0+ \frac{i}{2}T^0{}_1+ \frac{i}{2}T^1{}_0-T^1{}_1 & \frac{1}{2}T^0{}_0+\frac{1}{2}T^1{}_1 \end{pmatrix}

Now, I use the metric to lower the indices. Since the original metric ist Euclidean one can simply lower the indices of Twithout further factors, but not for T'.
T'_{00}=g'_{00}T'^0{}_0+g'_{01}T'^1{}_0 = \frac{1}{2}T'^1{}_0 = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}T_{00}+ \frac{i}{2}T_{01}+ \frac{i}{2}T_{10}-T_{11}) = \frac{1}{4}(T_{00}+2iT_{10}-T_{11})
I have used the symmetry of T_{\mu\nu}.
The plus sign in the middle of the expression is noch correct. Does someone see my mistake?

physicus
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K