Krajendren
- 3
- 0
A copper wire is in the form of a cylinder and has a resistance R. it is stretched till its thickness reduces by half of its initial size. Find its new resistance in terms of R.
Krajendren said:A copper wire is in the form of a cylinder and has a resistance R. it is stretched till its thickness reduces by half of its initial size. Find its new resistance in terms of R.
SAINATHAN said:its resistance will be increased.because R is always inversely proportional to length
DaleSpam said:This should probably go into the homework section, and you will need to show your work so far.
SAINATHAN said:its resistance will be increased.because R is always inversely proportional to length
Krajendren said:Thanks, could you please mention by how much the resistance will rise ?
gnurf said:R is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_resistance#DC_resistance" inversely proportional to length.
xcvxcvvc said:[tex]R = \rho \frac{h}{A}[/tex]
We must first notice that both area and length change so that the volume remains constant. We assume that the stretching results in a prefect cylinder that we began with. Therefore:
[tex]V = Ah = \pi r^2 h[/tex] and [tex]V[/tex] is a constant.
Thickness refers to the diameter of the cylinder, so to decrease its thickness by half, you must decrease its diameter by half (or its radius by a fourth). So the new area is:
[tex]A' = \pi (\frac{r}{4})^2 = \pi \frac{r}{16}[/tex]
xcvxcvvc said:Therefore, to destroy no matter and to keep volume constant, we must multiply [tex]h'[/tex] by a constant to keep [tex]V'[/tex] equal to [tex]V[/tex]:
[tex]V = V' = \pi r^2 h = (\pi \frac{r^2}{16})(Kh)[/tex]
Seen above, K must equal sixteen to cancel out that fractional sixteen, thus bringing both left and right equations equal and thus keeping volume constant.
To sum:
[tex]h' = 16h[/tex]
[tex]A' = \pi \frac{r^2}{16} = (\pi r^2) \frac{1}{16} = \frac{A}{16}[/tex]
We now plug in our new height and our new area into the equation for resistance:
[tex]R' = \rho \frac{16^2h}{A}= 16^2(\rho \frac{h}{A}) = 16^2 R[/tex]
sjb-2812 said:Are you sure? Aren't radius and diameter directly proportional, so that if you decrease the diameter by a half, you also decrease the radius by a half?