Coriolis force - Question about sign

Curious2013
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Dear all

I have a question concerning the Coriolis acceleration expression. I learned it as Ac = -2ω x v, where ω is the vector which indicates the rotation axis direction of Earth and v the velocity of a body that I want to check the Coriolis effect on.

My question: where the minus sign comes from? As far as I understand, it depends on what reference frame I use (inertial or non inertial - the minus comes from the latter, like the Earth, in my conception). Am I correct?

Thanks in advance!
 
Curious2013 said:
Dear all

I have a question concerning the Coriolis acceleration expression. I learned it as Ac = -2ω x v, where ω is the vector which indicates the rotation axis direction of Earth and v the velocity of a body that I want to check the Coriolis effect on.

My question: where the minus sign comes from?
You can swap ω and v, and the minus sign is gone:

-2ω x v = 2v x ω

Curious2013 said:
As far as I understand, it depends on what reference frame I use (inertial or non inertial
The Coriolis force exist only in non inertial frames.
 
The minus sign is there because humans made the arbitrary decision to use right-handed coordinate systems rather than left handed ones.

The Coriolis force is just a consequece of Newton's laws of motion. The physics doesn't depend on what frame you use to describe it, or whether the frame is inertial or non-inertial. The details of the math depend on those things, but "the map is not the country", and similarly "the math is not the phyiscs".
 
AlephZero said:
The minus sign is there because humans made the arbitrary decision to use right-handed coordinate systems rather than left handed ones.

no, it would still be there, because you'd still need v = ω x r :wink:

(btw, this is a duplicate thread to https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=659387)
 
AlephZero said:
The minus sign is there because humans made the arbitrary decision to use right-handed coordinate systems rather than left handed ones.
To me it seems more like it's the arbitrary decision to have ω first in the term.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K