MHB Corollary to Correspondence Theorem for Modules

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modules Theorem
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Joseph J. Rotman's book: Advanced Modern Algebra and I am currently focused on Section 6.1 Modules ...

I need some help with the proof of Corollary 6.25 ... Corollary to Theorem 6.22 (Correspondence Theorem) ... ...

Corollary 6.25 and its proof read as follows:View attachment 4925Can someone explain to me exactly how Corollary 6.25 follows from the Correspondence Theorem for Modules ...?

Hope that someone can help ...

Peter=============================================

*** EDIT ***

The above post refers to the Correspondence Theorem for Modules (Theorem 6.22 in Rotman's Advanced Modern Algebra) ... so I am proving the text of the Theorem from Rotman's Advanced Modern Algebra as follows:View attachment 4926
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: when $R$ itself is considered as a (left) $R$-module, the submodules of $R$ are precisely the (left) ideals of $R$.
 

Thread '##(A/\mathfrak{a})_{\mathfrak{p}/\mathfrak{a}}## and its isomorphism?'

I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
View full post »

Thread 'Questions about non existence of GCDs vs (coimages, cokernels)'

The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
View full post »

Thread 'Decomposition into irreps of compact Lie group'

When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
View full post »

Similar threads

Corollary to Correspondence Theorem for Modules
Replies
2
Views
3K
MHB Correspondence Theorem for Modules - Rotman, Section 6.1
Replies
1
Views
3K
MHB How Does the Correspondence Theorem Prove Maximal Submodules and Simplicity?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Rotman's Remarks on Modules in Context of Chain Conditions
Replies
2
Views
1K
MHB Noetherian Modules and Short Exact Sequences .... Bland, Corollary 4.2.6 ....
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Maximal Ideals and the Correspondence Theorem for Rings
Replies
3
Views
5K
I Correspondence Theorem for Groups .... Rotman, Propn 1.82 ....
Replies
5
Views
2K
MHB How Does the Correspondence Theorem for Rings Prove Maximal Ideals?
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB How to Prove Corollary 4.2.8 in Noetherian Rings?
Replies
6
Views
2K
MHB The Correspondence Theorem for Groups .... Rotman, Proposition 1.82 ....
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top