MHB Corollary to Correspondence Theorem for Modules

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modules Theorem
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Joseph J. Rotman's book: Advanced Modern Algebra and I am currently focused on Section 6.1 Modules ...

I need some help with the proof of Corollary 6.25 ... Corollary to Theorem 6.22 (Correspondence Theorem) ... ...

Corollary 6.25 and its proof read as follows:View attachment 4925Can someone explain to me exactly how Corollary 6.25 follows from the Correspondence Theorem for Modules ...?

Hope that someone can help ...

Peter=============================================

*** EDIT ***

The above post refers to the Correspondence Theorem for Modules (Theorem 6.22 in Rotman's Advanced Modern Algebra) ... so I am proving the text of the Theorem from Rotman's Advanced Modern Algebra as follows:View attachment 4926
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: when $R$ itself is considered as a (left) $R$-module, the submodules of $R$ are precisely the (left) ideals of $R$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'

Thread 'How to define a vector field?'

Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...
View full post »

Similar threads

Corollary to Correspondence Theorem for Modules
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
MHB Correspondence Theorem for Modules - Rotman, Section 6.1
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
MHB How Does the Correspondence Theorem Prove Maximal Submodules and Simplicity?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Rotman's Remarks on Modules in Context of Chain Conditions
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
MHB Noetherian Modules and Short Exact Sequences .... Bland, Corollary 4.2.6 ....
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Maximal Ideals and the Correspondence Theorem for Rings
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
I Correspondence Theorem for Groups .... Rotman, Propn 1.82 ....
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
MHB How Does the Correspondence Theorem for Rings Prove Maximal Ideals?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
MHB How to Prove Corollary 4.2.8 in Noetherian Rings?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
MHB The Correspondence Theorem for Groups .... Rotman, Proposition 1.82 ....
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K