Insights Corrections to MIT Open Courseware: Systems of Varying Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter haruspex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Mit Systems
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights significant concerns regarding the solutions provided in the MIT Open Courseware for the 8-01sc Classical Mechanics course, specifically in the section on applying Newton's Laws to systems of varying mass. The primary issue identified is that while the answers may be correct, the algebraic methods used are flawed, leading to potential confusion for students. A critical flaw noted is the incorrect representation of a system's momentum as a function of time while simultaneously treating it as a function of two variables, which results in contradictory equations. This confusion appears to stem from an improper application of the fundamental equations of motion, particularly the relationship between force, momentum, and mass variation. The reliability of MIT's material is questioned due to these inaccuracies.
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
42,655
Reaction score
10,435
Corrections to
MIT Open Courseware 8-01sc classical mechanics,
fall 2016
Applying Newton’s Laws to systems of Varying Mass
PDF Course Link
My concerns with the solutions provided on the cited MIT Open Courseware web page are, mostly:


Despite arriving at the correct answers, the algebraic methods are invalid. As a result, they can be utterly confusing to the student.
The main flaw, repeated throughout, is writing a system state (momentum) as a function of time only, but effectively defining it as a function of two variables. In some places, this leads to contradictory equations.


This mangled treatment likely results from an attempt to use ##F=\frac {dp}{dt}## in conjunction with ##\frac{dp}{dt}=m\frac{dv}{dt}+\frac{dm}{dt}v##, instead of the...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes bhobba, Delta2, Greg Bernhardt and 1 other person
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a bit concerning. I usually take material from MIT as being pretty much 'gospel' !
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes bhobba and Delta2
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hi everyone! I'm a senior majoring in physics, math, and music, and I'm currently in the process applying for theoretical and computational biophysics (primarily thru physics departments) Ph.D. programs. I have a 4.0 from a basically unknown school in the American South, two REUs (T50 and T25) in computational biophysics and two semesters of research in optics (one purely experimental, one comp/exp) at my home institution (since there aren't any biophysics profs at my school), but no...

Similar threads

Back
Top