stats_student said:
is there a specific name for these high end techniques? like are the categorized in under some search name?
thanks.
One could look at "localized corrosion monitoring" or "in situ assessment", or "in situ corrosion monitoring" as part of a phrase or in conjunction with corrosion, measurement and/or inspection as key words. One could also look for NDE/NDT or non-destructive evaluation/testing methods.
There are different approaches based on the scale. One may monitor the corrosion environment, e.g., measuring the electrochemical potential, but that requires know about the environment at the local of interest, and for a large system, e.g., air craft, ship, marine structure, nuclear reactor, space craft, there are lots of places to inspect and lots of environments. Looking at hundreds or thousands of rivets or bolts, or other connection for crevice corrosion is time consuming and may be unfeasible. Looking into large structures, e.g., pressure vessels, piping, beams, reinforced concrete structures can be very challenging.
In the case of inspection, one has various tools, e.g., ultrasonics, eddy current, visual, various radiographic (X-ray, gamma-ray, neutron) techniques. The problem with radiography is that the usually one has to place a source and detector on opposite sides of the structure of interest.
Examples of acoustic emission
Monitoring the corroding environment in conjunction with a structural analysis is yet another approach. The objective is to identify the locations most susceptible to corrosion and to monitor specific sites.
One would find a number of articles in Corrosion Journal on in situ assessment or monitoring of pitting or crevice corrosion.
e.g.,
http://corrosionjournal.org/doi/abs/10.5006/1.3452399
Of course, laboratory conditions (which tend to be more controlled) are more ideal than field conditions.