Corrosion Resistance Test for Steel Conduit: Hypothesis Setup and Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter needhelp83
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a hypothesis test concerning the corrosion-resistance properties of steel conduit, specifically focusing on the average penetration of specimens buried in soil over a two-year period. The original poster presents their findings and statistical calculations to determine if the true average penetration exceeds the specified limit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of significance levels and the correct application of test statistics and critical values in hypothesis testing. There is a focus on clarifying the original poster's calculations and assumptions regarding the hypothesis.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's methodology and calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct interpretation of statistical results, and there is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the hypothesis test results.

Contextual Notes

Participants question the original significance level stated by the poster and clarify the correct usage of statistical terms and values in the context of hypothesis testing.

needhelp83
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
Ok...this is one of my first hypothesis test, so I wanted to make sure I am doing everything correctly. Thanks for any suggestions.

To obtain information on the corrosion-resistance properties of a certain type of steel conduit, 45 specimens are buried in soil for a 2-yr period. The maximum penetration (in mils) for each specimen is then measured, yielding a sample average penetration of \overline{x} = 52.7 and a sample standard deviation of s = 4.8. The conduits were manufactured with the specification that true average penetration be at most 50 mils. They will be used unless it can be demonstrated conclusively that the specification hasn't been met.

Ho: \mu=50
Ha: \mu>50

Test criteria:
Z=\frac{\overline{x}-50}{s/\sqrt{n}} = \frac{52.7-50}{4.8/\sqrt{45}}= 3.77

Significance level = 95%, so Z .05 = 1.645

1.645>3.77 False
Since 1.645 !> 3.77, we don't reject Ho.

We cannot conclude that the specifications have not been met, so the corrosion resistance properties will be used.

Thanks again for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) The significance level would never be set to 95% - do you mean 5%?
b) You've carried out your test incorrectly - go back and look at how the calculated test statistic and the critical value (this is the 1.645) should be used.
 
a) The significance level would never be set to 95% - do you mean 5%?

Yes, I meant 5%

b) You've carried out your test incorrectly - go back and look at how the calculated test statistic and the critical value (this is the 1.645) should be used.

Yes, I interpreted my notes wrong for the test statistic and critical value.

It should be

3.77 > 1.645

Since 3.77 > 1.645 we reject Ho.


We can conclude that the specifications have not been met, so the corrosion resistance properties will not be used.
 
Is this what you were referring to statdad?
 
Perfect - yes, now you have it. I see I missed an earlier question from you - sorry about that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
13K