Cosmic microwave background and a reference frame

BarbaraDav
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Dear Friends

A fleet of spaceships is given, each equipped with a differential microwave radiometer,
just like COBE was, whose detectors are antipodeanly pointing (this way one should catch
blue shifted radiation and the other one red shifted). Could their acquisitions be used to
establish a reference frame locally (!) motionless respect the cosmic microwave background ?
Supposing a such reference frame does exist, is there any reason to think it's an inertial one ?

Best wishes.

Barbara Da Vinci
Rome
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BarbaraDav said:
A fleet of spaceships is given, each equipped with a differential microwave radiometer,
just like COBE was, whose detectors are antipodeanly pointing (this way one should catch
blue shifted radiation and the other one red shifted). Could their acquisitions be used to
establish a reference frame locally (!) motionless respect the cosmic microwave background ?
Yes.
BarbaraDav said:
Supposing a such reference frame does exist, is there any reason to think it's an inertial one ?
Well, in GR the idea of inertial and non-inertial reference frames doesn't really exist any more.
 
is there any reason to think it's an inertial one ?
Interesting. The nearest thing to an inertial frame in GR is a freely-falling frame. If one of your ships should adjust itself to be stationary in the CBR frame, and can maintain that without using its engines then for that ship the CBR frame may be inertial.

In other words, if the CBR frame coincides with the local FF frame, then it is inertial. Because of the irregular distribution of matter in the local universe, it's not likely to happen. Perhaps in one of the great voids where all matter is very, very far away, this coincidence would be more likely.
 
Please, what's "FF frame" ?
 
local FF = "local free falling" (i.e. a local frame centered on an inertial observer)
 
I see. Thanks !
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Back
Top