What is the Wavelength of Emitted Photon in a Cosmological Redshift Scenario?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the wavelength of an emitted photon in a cosmological redshift scenario, particularly addressing part (d) of the problem. The user successfully derived the expressions for the comoving distance and the scale factor, concluding that the scale factor is a function of time as \(a(t) = t^{2/3}\). For part (d), the user is uncertain about integrating the distance equation to find the emitted wavelength and how to relate it to the observed wavelengths. It is clarified that the calculations should assume the same universe model as in part (b). The user seeks confirmation on their approach and understanding of the problem's context.
Joella Kait
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a point in the intergalactic medium at some cosmic time ## t_{obs}##, the time of arrival of a photon of wavelength ##λ_{obs}## as seen by a hydrogen atom at that location. The source of this photon a comoving distance ##r## away emitted it at wavelength ##λ_{em}## at time ##t_{em}##. Assume the scale factor at present ##a_0= 1##.

(a) Express ##r## as a function of ##t_{obs}##, ##t_{em}## and the scale factor ##a(t)##.

(b) Solve for the dependence of ##a(t)## on ##t## for a universe in which the Hubble constant varies with time according to
\ H(t)=\frac{2}{3t}.

(c) What is the ratio of ##λ_{em}## to ##λ_{obs}## in terms of ##t_{em}## and ##t_{obs}##, in a universe described in (b)?

(d) The same photon will later reach a telescope on Earth today at ##λ_0=3645 Angstroms##. Suppose ##λ_{obs}=1215 Angstroms##, the H atom Lyman-alpha line transition. What is ##λ_{em}## if the source is located a comoving distance ##r=500 Mpc## (in present-day units) away from the H atom? Assume ##H_0=70 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}##.

I mainly just want help with part (d).

Homework Equations


[/B]
## ds^2=-c^2dt^2+a(t)^2[dr^2+s_k(r)^2d\Omega^2## but ##ds=0## and ##d\Omega=0##
##H(t)=\frac{1}{a}*\frac{da}{dt}##
##\frac{\lambda_{em}}{a(t_{em})}=\frac{\lambda_{obs}}{a(t_{obs})}##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
For part (a) I intergrated and got ## r=c\int\limits_{t_{em}}^{t_{obs}} \frac{1}{a(t)} \ dt ##.
For part (b) I used the second equation to get ##a(t)=t^{2/3}##
For part (c) I used the third equation to get ##\frac{\lambda_{em}}{\lambda_{obs}}=\frac{t_{em}^{2/3}}{t_{obs}^{2/3}}##
I'm really lost on part (d) though. I was told that I'm supposed to integrate my answer from (a), but I am not quite sure how to go about that.
##r=c\int\limits_{t_{em}}^{t_{obs}} \frac{1}{t^{2/3}} \ dt = 3c(t_{obs}^{1/3}-t_{em}^{1/3})##
I'm not sure how to get ##\lambda's## from this, and I'm also not sure how to include ##t_0/\lambda_0##
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
##\lambda_{obs}## is not the wavelength observed on Earth at the present time. It is the wavelength observed by a comoving hydrogen atom at some intermediate time ##t_{obs}##.
 
  • Like
Likes Joella Kait
Orodruin said:
##\lambda_{obs}## is not the wavelength observed on Earth at the present time. It is the wavelength observed by a comoving hydrogen atom at some intermediate time ##t_{obs}##.
Thanks! I somehow over looked that it said hydrogen atom. For part (d) do you think it's still assuming the same universe as in part (b)?
 
Joella Kait said:
Thanks! I somehow over looked that it said hydrogen atom. For part (d) do you think it's still assuming the same universe as in part (b)?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K