Redshift of non-comoving galaxy

  • Thread starter Thread starter wabbit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy Redshift
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Messages
1,284
Reaction score
208

Homework Statement


In a flat FRW universe, for a source moving radially at velocity v (at emission time) relative to the local comoving frame, what is the redshift observed by a comoving observer?

Homework Equations


##c=1##
Proper time to cosmological time ratio ##\frac{d\tau}{dt}=\sqrt{1-v^2}##
Redshift of comoving source ##\frac{\lambda_{obs}}{\lambda_{em}}=\frac{a(t_{obs})}{a(t_{em})}##
Note : Abusing terminology here, the "redshifts" here are quoted as ##S=z+1## intead of ##z##.

The Attempt at a Solution


Based of the infinitesimal motion of the source and on light paths, I get $$\frac{\lambda_{obs}}{\lambda_{em}^{com}}=(1+v)\frac{a(t_{obs})}{a(t_{em})}$$
This is the redshift between ##\lambda_{em}^{com}## measured at emission time in a comoving frame, and ##\lambda_{obs}## measured by the comoving receiver.
And combining this with ##\frac{\lambda_{em}^{com}}{\lambda_{em}}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}##, the total redshift is
$$\frac{\lambda_{obs}}{\lambda_{em}}=\sqrt{\frac{1+v}{1-v}}\frac{a(t_{obs})}{a(t_{em})}$$

Can someone confirm if this correct, and if not point to the error? This is not exactly homework, rather a calculation I did since I wondered about that case, and I didn't find the relevant formula online to check against.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you can split the problem in two parts. Find the frequency or wavelength observed by a comoving observer at (nearly) the same place, then apply the usual scale factor for distant observers. And the result is exactly what you got if the object is moving away.
 
Thanks - Indeed, I didn't see it this way, the result is just a Doppler shift times an expansion shift, that's a much better way to get it than what I did !