Cosmological Scalar Field Density Dilution

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a homogeneous free scalar field with a quadratic potential in a cosmological context, specifically focusing on its energy density dilution as the universe expands. Participants explore the implications of the scalar field's oscillations and how these relate to cosmological dynamics, referencing concepts from modern cosmology and specific literature.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an equation for the energy density's time evolution and expresses uncertainty about the next steps, questioning whether to use Friedmann's equation or convert the time derivative to a scale factor derivative.
  • Another participant suggests consulting a specific paper for additional insights, indicating that it may provide relevant details.
  • A later reply summarizes the Klein-Gordon equation and emphasizes the assumption of neglecting Hubble friction, suggesting that the scalar field behaves like an underdamped oscillator when the mass is large.
  • This reply also proposes a specific form for the scalar field's oscillation and discusses how to derive the energy density's dependence on the scale factor, leading to a conclusion about the dilution behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to demonstrate the energy density dilution, as there are differing opinions on whether to apply Friedmann's equation or to focus on the oscillatory behavior of the scalar field. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal method for proceeding with the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the dominance of the scalar field relative to other species in the universe, which may affect the applicability of certain equations. There is also a lack of clarity on the assumptions required for the derivations presented.

Samama Fahim
Messages
52
Reaction score
4
Consider a homogeneous free scalar field ##\phi## of mass m which has a
potential

$$V(\phi) = \frac{1}{2}m^2\phi^2$$

Show that, for ##m ≫ H##, the scalar field undergoes oscillations with
frequency given by $m$ and that its energy density dilutes as
##a^{−3}##.

This is from Modern Cosmology, Scott Dodelson, Chapter 6.

For the part "Show that its energy density dilutes as ##a^{−3}##", following is my attempt:

In the equation ##\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = -3H(P+\rho)##, put ##P = \frac{1}{2} \dot{\phi}^2-V(\phi)## and ##\rho=\frac{1}{2} \dot{\phi}^2+V(\phi)## to get

$$\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = -3\frac{\dot{a}}{a}\dot{\phi}^2,$$

where ##H = \dot{a}/a##. I am not sure how to proceed or proceed or whether this is the correct approach. Should I use Friedmann's equation instead? But it involves densities of other species as well, and there is no assumption here whether one species dominates. Or Should I convert ##d\rho/dt## to ##d \rho/ da##?

Kindly provide a hint as to how to proceed.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Sorry, going through my replies and must have missed this at the time...
The paper goes into some detail but you can proceed in a more simple way.

Recall from the Klein Gordon equation for the inflation,$$\ddot{\phi} + 3H\dot{\phi} + V' = 0$$The key assumption is to neglect the Hubble friction, ##3H\dot{\phi} \ll 1##, i.e. you have an underdamped oscillator when ##m## is large. We are given that the potential is quadratic (this would also apply for small oscillations around any quadratic minimum), so you have ##V' = m^2\phi## and the equation of motion ##\ddot{\phi} + m^2 \phi = 0## is just SHM with frequency ##m##. So write, for example,$$\phi = \phi_0 \cos{m t}$$For the next part, you have the right idea,$$\dot{\rho} = -3H(\rho + P) = -3H \dot{\phi}^2 $$Finally you just look at the time average. Note ##\langle \dot{\phi}^2 \rangle = \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi_0^2 = \langle \rho \rangle##, so you just get$$d \ (\log \langle \rho \rangle) = -3 \ d (\log a)$$which then spits out the ##\rho \sim a^{-3}## dependence after inflation ends.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K