Could a high electric field pull particles out of the vacuum?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the possibility of generating electron-positron pairs from the vacuum using a high electric field. Participants explore the theoretical implications of such a phenomenon, referencing concepts from quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics (QED). The conversation includes various interpretations of the energy dynamics involved in this process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that a sufficiently high electric field could separate virtual particles, preventing them from recombining, thus allowing real particles to emerge from the vacuum.
  • Another participant cautions that virtual particles require energy to become real, referencing Hawking Radiation as an example of energy dynamics in particle creation.
  • It is noted that an electric field of 10^17 volts/metre has enough energy to produce electron-positron pairs, suggesting that the energy comes from the field itself.
  • A participant identifies this process as the Schwinger mechanism, which theoretically allows for vacuum polarization and pair production, though experimental validation remains elusive.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of charge conservation and the role of external voltage sources in maintaining the electric field necessary for pair production.
  • There is speculation about whether the energy for particle creation could be considered "free" energy, with differing views on the nature of energy transfer in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the source of energy for particle creation, with some asserting that the energy comes from the electric field while others argue it must be supplied externally. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing interpretations present.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific assumptions about the behavior of virtual particles and the conditions under which they can become real. The discussion also touches on the limitations of current experimental evidence regarding the Schwinger mechanism.

johne1618
Messages
368
Reaction score
0
If one had a high enough electric field could one pull electrons and positrons into existence out of the vacuum?

The field needs to be high enough to accelerate the virtual particles away from each other strongly enough so they don't get a chance to recombine.

If a particle has acceleration g then there is a horizon distance r behind it given by:

r = c^2 / g...(1)

such that no light signal starting at a distance of r or greater could ever reach the accelerating particle. Thus no virtual partner particle at a distance r or greater could recombine with the accelerating particle. This gives us an uncertainty in the particle position that we can convert into a momentum and then into an energy using the uncertainty principle.

If we have the uncertainty principle:

Momentum * distance = Planck constant

using E = p c

E / c * r = h

E = h c / r

Substituting for r in the above equation using (1)

E = h g / c

as E = M c^2

then we have

M = h g / c^3

Thus if we provide an acceleration g using an electric field we can produce a pair of particles of mass M.

For electrons/positrons being accelerated by a field F we have:

m_e = (h / c^3) * (e F / m_e)

F = m_e^2 c^3 / h e

F = field = 10^17 Volts / metre

It seems to me that the rest mass energy of the particle pair doesn't come out of the applied electric field but rather from out of the vacuum itself. The applied field just provides the acceleration to separate the virtual particles. The extra energy supplied to the particles during their acceleration could in principle be recovered in the process of bringing them back to rest.

Is this right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


You have to be careful when treating virtual particles, because the only reason they exist is due to the uncertainty principle associated with energy and time.

When you want these virtual particles to become real particles (Ie you can point to a location of space and say they exist) you need to provide their rest energy in some form otherwise there will be an energy deficit.

This is what Hawking Radiation is associated about, with these pair-annihilation events taking place near the event horizon of a Black hole. Sometimes, the gravitational pull will be greater on one of the pair, than the other, seeing one partner (for example the electron) pulled into the black hole. This results in the other partner (the positron in this case) not having a partner to annhilate with and over stay its cheating of energy that the uncertainty princple allows it to do. So where does the energy come from in this case as clearly we have created a particle form nothing? Theory tells us the mass of the black hole actually decreases in the exchange.

So with your theory, I don't like the way you have derived it, especially using E = pc. However, I would say if you provided an electric field with an energy density of the rest mass of an electron AND position (need to conserve charge - with the above BH, we black holes have charge so we don't have to worry about charge not being conserved). That is a very large electric field. So it is possible, just like it is in accelerators.
 


Actually an electric field of 10^17 volts/metre itself does have enough energy in a cubic electron compton wavelength to produce an electron/positron pair.

So I guess the electron/positron pair would come out of the applied electric field after all.
 
This is exactly the Schwinger mechanism to polarize the vacuum and produce the electron-positron pair. Unfortunately, as a non-perturbative results from QED, no direct experimental test has ever been done. In 1997, Bula from SLAC carried out a similar experiment with intense lasers and high-energy electrons.
 


johne1618 said:
Actually an electric field of 10^17 volts/metre itself does have enough energy in a cubic electron compton wavelength to produce an electron/positron pair.

So I guess the electron/positron pair would come out of the applied electric field after all.

I believe it could produce pairs even if it were a weaker field, just with less probability.
 
Perhaps the high electric field merely "pulls back the veil" allowing particle pairs to leap out of the vacuum?

Is this "free" energy?
 
no, if a particle-antiparticle pair forms in the electric field, the positive particle will move in the direction of the field and the negative particle will move in the opposite direction. If you had the field produced by two isolated parallel plates, this would tend to decrease the charge on each of the plates, decreasing the field strength between them. The energy of the pair is gained by decreasing the energy of the electrostatic field.

If the plates are connected to (a huge) voltage source, there would be the need for charge to flow to keep the field the same. Thus, the external voltage source would produce the work necessary for a particle-antiparticle pair to emerge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K