Could a superearth be hospitable (survivable?) for humans?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Czcibor
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential habitability of a hypothetical super-Earth for humans, considering various factors such as gravity, atmospheric conditions, local life forms, and the implications of genetic modification. Participants explore theoretical scenarios regarding the environmental and biological challenges that might arise on such a planet.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a super-Earth with eight times Earth's mass would have roughly twice the gravity, which could be challenging but not necessarily lethal for humans.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for local life to produce non-edible substances and the possibility of humans being vulnerable to unknown microorganisms.
  • There is speculation about the implications of protein chirality, with some suggesting that local life may not be compatible with human digestion.
  • Participants discuss the adaptability of humans to harsh climates, questioning whether long-term space travel would affect their ability to acclimate to new environments.
  • Some argue that genetically modified humans might be necessary for colonization, while others caution that this shifts the focus of the discussion away from the characteristics of the planet itself.
  • The potential interactions between introduced bacteria and local organisms are noted as a significant concern.
  • There is a debate about the motivations for space colonization, with some suggesting that geopolitical tensions historically spurred interest in space exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the habitability of a super-Earth, with no consensus on the implications of gravity, local life, or the necessity of genetic modification. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the feasibility of human survival and adaptation in such environments.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about local life, atmospheric conditions, and the effects of gravity are not fully explored, leaving open questions about their impact on human survivability. The discussion also touches on the speculative nature of interstellar travel and the role of technology versus biology in overcoming challenges.

  • #31
Drakkith said:
You know, I've never really thought much about immunity vs local organisms. I suppose its possible, if not probable, for either ourselves to be completely immune to practically everything on the planets, or extremely vulnerable to said organisms?

If you can't digest it, it can't digest you.

Basic rule of space exploration.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #32
ImaLooser said:
If you can't digest it, it can't digest you.

Basic rule of space exploration.
Please provide a source (or at least a good reason) for that claim.

Here are counterexamples to take into account:
We can digest plants, but how can plants digest us?
Viruses can digest us, but how can we digest viruses?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K