Could Amino Acids Really Originate from Space?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origins of amino acids, specifically whether they can form in space or if they are formed on other celestial bodies and transported to Earth. It explores theoretical and experimental perspectives on the formation of organic molecules in the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that there is no evidence for amino acid formation in space, suggesting instead that they may originate from other planets or bodies and be transported to Earth through ballistic means.
  • Others argue that complex organic molecules, including amino acids, can form in the interstellar medium under certain conditions, such as the presence of high-energy radiation and a suitable mixture of elements.
  • A participant highlights that amino acids are not particularly complex and their presence in space does not necessarily imply a connection to life, suggesting that they could arise from common elements in gas clouds.
  • There is a proposal that both processes—formation in space and ejection from planets—could contribute to the presence of amino acids and other organic compounds in the universe.
  • One participant references experimental work indicating that organic compounds can be synthesized within crystalline structures in a gas-rich environment, suggesting a non-biological origin for many organic molecules found in space.
  • Concerns are raised about the rarity of collisions that could eject material from Earth, questioning whether this mechanism alone can account for the amino acids observed in the solar system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms of amino acid formation, with no consensus reached on whether they originate in space or from other bodies. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the conditions necessary for amino acid formation, the definitions of terms used, and the unresolved nature of the mechanisms discussed.

Hunter1234
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
After having a debate with somebody about amino acids found in space, they replied, " As for the amino acids, we simply have no evidence that they can actually form in space -- it is indeed quite a ridiculous assertion. I am reminded of a PhD named Hugh Ross who actually talked about something on Mars that may be discovered in the future, and he had quite a good hypothesis on how life on Earth could actually be somehow found on Mars. He points out that the early Earth was repeatedly bombarded with thousands of asteroids/meteorites/comets, and with these thousands of impacts, it would shake some life and life remains, amino acids, amongst other things off of the Earth and into space -- once these things get into space and start getting throughout our solar system, they can easily get on the comets/meteoroids in our solar system, and thus extrapolating the hypothesis Hugh Ross formed of Earth's life on Mars, it can account for amino acids on asteroids/meteorites/comets. " After reading this hypothesis, it seemed absurd to me. It would be helpful if somebody could educate me on this topic.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Which is the question? Amino acid formation in space? (No.) Or, formation on some planet/other body and ballistic transport? (Yes.)
 
Bystander said:
Which is the question? Amino acid formation in space? (No.) Or, formation on some planet/other body and ballistic transport? (Yes.)
Both if you don't mind.
 
Bystander said:
(No.)

Bystander said:
(Yes.)
 
I'll stand with the assertion of a ballistic source; collision rates in free space are simply too low.
 
Collisions that emit material from Earth are incredibly rare. I would be very surprised if that is sufficient to produce all the amino acids observed in the solar system, and it certainly does not explain amino acids in interstellar splace. What is wrong with amino acid formation on dust particles, comets or other objects without such a deep gravity well and "atmosphere shield"?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
Amino acids are not particularly complicated molecules.
The fact that they are an essential component of life as we know it, does not mean that their presence in space is anything to do with life.
Given the right mixture of (fairly commonplace) elements in a gas cloud, and probably a bit of high energy radiation to stir things up, simple organic molecules are not surprising.
Alcohol (of the drinking type, ethanol), is also found in some parts of space, that doesn't mean there is a bar somewhere in the area.
I think it is more likely that whatever kickstarted life involved these simple organics because they were already there,
as opposed to life having caused them to be there.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2 and berkeman
rootone said:
I think it is more likely that whatever kickstarted life involved these simple organics because they were already there, as opposed to life having caused them to be there.

This is in principle correct, but there are still two questions: Were these simple organics amino acids and did they came from space? And I'm afraid we will never know for sure.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
  • #10
Even if the density of molecules in an interstellar gas cloud in not dense enough for molecules to form shock wave through this media can change these densities sufficiently to change that.
 
  • #11
Gary Feierbach said:
can change these densities sufficiently to change that.
... and, the reverse reaction?
 
  • #12
Did complex organic compounds arise in space or were they created and then ejected from planets? Why must it be one or the other? The answer is almost certainly both.
Experiments with pure lab grade MgO crystals––grown from the melt––have demonstrated that organic compounds, chiefly long aliphatic chains, are rapidly and spontaneously synthesized within the crystal itself. This research is not at all speculative. Over 300 compounds have been directly observed, most created by the addition of additional monomers to a growing chain. This process occurs wherever crystallization of oxide materials occurs "within a gas-rich environment." That is to say it occurs virtually everywhere from the titanic outpourings of exploding supernovas, to the ash and lava spewed from volcanoes, to the crystallizing magmas deep within the Earth, these solid-solution chemistry and solid-state physics effects obtain. A great deal of this research has been done at NASA-Ames Research Center by Dr. Friedemann Freund and his late son Dr. Mino Freund.
The existence of these organic compounds within the interstellar dust––and their ready synthesis by the same rock crystallization process in the laboratory––strongly suggests that the vast preponderance of organic compounds in the universe are created not by living systems, nor within idealized "warm puddle" conditions, but in the most unexpected of origins––solid rock. Almost as a bonus, this process also sequesters a previously unanticipated reservoir of reduced hydrogen within the crust and mantle, which is vast if dispersed thinly.
Much has been hypothesized about the products of cold gaseous chemistry within the dust clouds. Surface synthesis may well occur, but such products are vulnerable to periodic destruction by supernovas. An interesting consequence of this solid solution chemistry process is that the products, arising within the rock, rapidly reform when the rock is melted and cools. Even within microscopic grains, components like C, H and N can be conserved, reduced and recombined from melt to solid phase as these reduced components are systematically excluded from the crystal. Thus, our universe is virtually awash in complex organic polymers and their monomer components––from rocky planets and asteroids to the most evanescent dust clouds. Solid solution chemistry rocks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bandersnatch, Hunter1234 and rootone
  • #13
Unamuno said:
...
Welcome to PF, nice first post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K