Could an Exomoon Survive Permenant Shade from a Gas Giant?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of an exomoon, comparable in size to Titan, maintaining a stable orbit around a gas giant or brown dwarf while being permanently shaded from its star. It is established that such an orbit is not viable due to the instability of the L1 and L2 Lagrange points, which cannot support large celestial bodies without constant trajectory corrections. The consensus is that the described scenario has been previously analyzed and deemed impossible, as the gravitational dynamics do not allow for a stable configuration over billions of years.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrange points, specifically L1 and L2 stability
  • Knowledge of celestial mechanics and orbital dynamics
  • Familiarity with gas giants and their gravitational influence
  • Basic concepts of exomoons and their characteristics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the stability of Lagrange points in celestial mechanics
  • Explore the gravitational dynamics of gas giants and their moons
  • Investigate the characteristics and formation of exomoons
  • Review previous forum discussions on similar astronomical configurations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, science fiction writers, and astrophysics enthusiasts interested in the dynamics of celestial bodies and the plausibility of exomoon scenarios.

thursdaypostal
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, thank you for reading my post.

For a story I am working on I am wondering about the plausibility of some star and planet configurations. I have done some web research on my own and learned a lot, but for some things I think my vocabulary and knowledge is too limited to search for exactly what I want.

What I would like to have is a large gas planet (or a brown dwarf) as the lone planet circling a star. Orbiting this planet would be an exomoon, perhaps the size of Titan (a larger, spherical moon).

Is it possible for a stable orbit to exist between the planet and moon where the moon is either

  1. Orbiting slowly enough so that it is locked between the star and planet, causing a solar eclipse on part of the planet's surface permenantly, or
  2. Behind the planet in a line with the star, causing the moon to be permenantly hidden from the star (permenantly in a lunar eclipse)?

Is this the same as an object being in the gas planet's L1-L2 points? I have read that these points are not very stable, especially for large objects, for Earth anyway, so I wonder how large a moon could exist in the L1-L2 points of a very large planet/brown dwarf. Ideally, for the story, it would be on the range of 3+ billion years.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
thursdaypostal said:
Is this the same as an object being in the gas planet's L1-L2 points? I have read that these points are not very stable,
Yes, that's the only case where it could work. But these are not just 'not very stable' - they're unstable. You can't hold a moon there in the same way as you can't make a needle stand on its tip. The satellites that use those points must correct their trajectories with thrusters to stay where they are.

I'm afraid it can't be made to work. The scenario you described has been discussed in this section of the forum many times. Try looking through old threads for more details.
 
Bandersnatch said:
I'm afraid it can't be made to work. The scenario you described has been discussed in this section of the forum many times. Try looking through old threads for more details.

I was worried that was the case. I tried mostly searching words like eclipse or lagrange/lagrangian, but I'll look around some more. Thanks for the quick reply.

Edit: already found some. Lots of interesting discussion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
957
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K