Could Elements Weigh Differently on Other Planets?

  • Thread starter Thread starter John1397
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gold Silver
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether a pound of gold can weigh more than a pound of silver under any circumstances, particularly in relation to the universe as a whole. Participants explore concepts of weight, mass, and the implications of different units of measurement, as well as gravitational effects on different planets.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that a pound is a pound, regardless of the material, emphasizing that weight is a measure of gravitational force and is consistent across different materials in the same gravitational field.
  • Others point out that the definition of a pound varies depending on whether it is an avoirdupois or troy pound, which could lead to different interpretations of the question.
  • One participant introduces the concept of rest mass versus relativistic mass, suggesting that the question may hinge on language rather than physics.
  • There is speculation about how weight could differ on other planets due to variations in gravitational forces, although this is met with skepticism by some participants.
  • Another participant notes that while a pound of gold and a pound of silver would weigh the same under standard conditions, the number of atoms and isotopes could introduce complexity in specific scenarios.
  • Some posts question the relevance of the original question, suggesting it lacks clarity or meaning in the context of established physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the interpretation of the original question and the implications of weight and mass. While some assert that a pound remains constant across materials, others introduce conditions that could lead to different interpretations, leaving the discussion unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the original question's clarity, particularly regarding the phrase "relative to the universe as a whole," which some find nonsensical. The discussion also touches on the need for precise definitions of weight and mass in different contexts.

John1397
Messages
189
Reaction score
18
I am not an engineer so I was wondering if a pound of gold can ever weigh more than a pound of silver under any circumstances relative to the universe as a whole?

John
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The question doesn't make sense. A pound is a pound is a pound. They are all equal. But "relative to the universe as a whole" has no meaning I can discern.
 
It depends upon which 'pound' unit you are using.

Pounds avoirdupois consist of 7000 grains or approx. 453.6 g
Pounds troy consist of 5760 grains or approx. 373.2 g

1 pound avoirdupois is also divided into 16 ounces, while the troy pound is divided into 12 troy ounces.

When quoting the price of a precious metal like gold, the amount is always for 1 troy ounce.
 
There is much more stuff. If you are talking a bout the rest mass it will not change as far as we know, but there is also the relativistic mass, and then there is weight (the gravitational force on a planet) So in a way the question is one of language and not of physics.
 
I was thinking in the terms of Dimensionless Numbers when posting question.

John
 
SteamKing said:
It depends upon which 'pound' unit you are using.

Pounds avoirdupois consist of 7000 grains or approx. 453.6 g
Pounds troy consist of 5760 grains or approx. 373.2 g

1 pound avoirdupois is also divided into 16 ounces, while the troy pound is divided into 12 troy ounces.

When quoting the price of a precious metal like gold, the amount is always for 1 troy ounce.

0xDEADBEEF said:
There is much more stuff. If you are talking a bout the rest mass it will not change as far as we know, but there is also the relativistic mass, and then there is weight (the gravitational force on a planet) So in a way the question is one of language and not of physics.
Let us assume in the context of the OP, that one uses the same unit of mass in the same inertial frame in the same gravitational field. Then a pound is a pound as Russ mentioned. The number of moles (atoms) will be different and volumes will be different.

Silver has an atomic weight (mass) of 107.87 amu and density of 10490 kg/m3, and gold has an atomic mass of 196.97 amu and density of 19300 kg/m3. The density is reported at room temperature and 1 atm pressure.
 
John
I am not an engineer so I was wondering if a pound of gold can ever weigh more than a pound of silver under any circumstances relative to the universe as a whole?

The short answer is no since the measure 1 pound mass is almost independent of the material considered and quite independent for practical purposes.

However

The weight of a 1 pound mass is a measure of the force of attraction of gravity, which in turn is the aggregated sum of the forces of attraction of all the particles.
Now it is entirely conceivable that one pound mass of rarified gas in a tall thin column might aggregate to less attractive force than a flat, consolidated lump of gold because the upper particles are further away and therefore subject to a smaller force of attraction in the gas column.
However you have specified gold and silver which will make very similar lumps.

The other issue is whether you can fit an exact number of atoms of either into one pound mass.
So if you wish to measure the quantity of gold or silver by whole numbers of atoms then yes the gold will weigh more.
Further both metals have isotopes that would change these weights slightly if included.
 
Last edited:
Which weighs more? A pound of lead or a pound of feathers?
 
SteamKing said:
Which weighs more? A pound of lead or a pound of feathers?
You are off topic because gold and silver are both precious metals. Stop. Now.
John1397 said:
I am not an engineer so I was wondering if a pound of gold can ever weigh more than a pound of silver under any circumstances
Yes. A pound of gold at the center of the Earth weighs nothing, more or less. An avoirdupois pound of silver at the mantle-core boundary weighs more than a pound (pound force).

relative to the universe as a whole?
This makes no sense, so I ignored this part of your question.
 
  • #10
D H said:
This makes no sense, so I ignored this part of your question.


Just speculating that on other planets weights of elements could be different.
 
  • #11
John1397 said:
Just speculating that on other planets weights of elements could be different.
No.

Read our rules on posting "personal theories or speculations that go beyond or counter to generally-accepted science."

Thread locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K