Could Physically Slamming on a Table Damage the Home Floor/Structure?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kyphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Damage Home Table
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential structural impact of slamming arms down on a dinner table, particularly whether such an action could cause damage to the home’s flooring or underlying structure. Participants explore the physics of force transfer and the resilience of household materials in response to this behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario where they slammed their arms down on a sturdy table, questioning if the force could have caused damage to the floor or structure beneath it.
  • Several participants argue that the force generated by a person's body weight alone is unlikely to damage the floor or underlying joists, even with significant downward force applied to the table.
  • Another participant suggests that if the table did not sustain damage, it is improbable that the floor or beams underneath were affected.
  • There is a discussion about whether the table could absorb shock or amplify the force transmitted to the floor, with one participant comparing it to the effect of using brass knuckles to increase impact force.
  • Some participants emphasize that the structural integrity of housing materials is generally robust enough to withstand such impacts without sustaining damage.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that it is unlikely for the floor or structural components to be damaged by the described actions. However, there are differing views on the specifics of force transfer and the potential for shock absorption versus amplification by the table.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the discussion is influenced by the pre-existing condition of the home’s structure, which may complicate assessments of damage. The specifics of force distribution and the mechanics of impact are also highlighted as areas of uncertainty.

kyphysics
Messages
686
Reaction score
446
Over the Thanksgiving holidays, I had a heated argument with my parents in their home (where I reside temporarily too). Out of anger, I physically slammed my arms down on their dinner table extremely hard. I was in a rage (b/c they went out during COVID's surge when we've already lost a family member to it and I warned them not to go out during this time...it was sort of a "love rage" in a desire to protect them) and I think I might have even thought to myself I wanted to break the table in half. Suffice it to say, I was super mad and slammed my arms very, very hard, using my upper body's weight (sort of rising up and then flopping/falling with my upper-body's weight down onto my arms for even more force). I did this about three times (prior to which I also slammed my hands down on it just moderately hard - that was my first reaction, before rage filled me and I went all out).

The table itself is very study, as it's an older style one with metal legs and has metal "bars" underneath it reinforcing the center. It didn't break, but looks like it may have very, very slightly bent a bit (or, it could just be pre-existing - not sure).

Our home was inspected for repairs underneath it and we were told we had some joists, beams, and flooring (although, not in this kitchen table spot) needing repair. So, already, there's been some possible "weakness" in the floor/structure. With me slamming down on the table like that (I am 5'9 and weigh 185 lbs. - fat, not muscle, LOL), could this force have caused a "reverberation" through the flooring and maybe damaged something underneath it? Like could it have caused cracks in the sub-floor or "damage" of some sort (maybe cracks too) in the beams and joists underneath?

The floor in the kitchen itself has no cracks (it's tiled). Maybe the location of where I slammed it (underneath the legs of the table) have a SLIGHT "lower" unevenness to the tiles. But, it's not something you'd notice unless someone pointed it out (and even then it's maybe hard to tell). It could have been uneven beforehand too, as I'm not sure. Basically, there's nothing super noticeable, but maybe a slight "indented lower" feel to some tiled areas (but, again, it could just be my fear/imagination).

From a physics point-of-view, could the force of these slams have be hard enough to "damage" stuff structurally underneath the floors? Or, would my slamming force have "dissipated" throughout the table itself (with the table absorbing the shock and not the floor)? I didn't slam the floor, but rather a study table on top of it. But, it felt SOOO HARD that I thought to myself what if I really damaged the floor/structure of the home.

*I could take pics of the table and tiles if that helps* Just wondering in general if this is a rational/reasonable analysis & fear?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There shouldn't be anything you can do with your body weight alone that can damage the floor -- even if you fall hard enough to injure yourself (like falling off a stepladder). Certainly not in a different place, not directly underneath.

No, you can't damage the floor just by pounding your fists on the dinner table.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and hutchphd
Also, if you didn't hit the table hard enough to damage your hands, it's very likely that you didn't hit the table hard enough to damage it or what's underneath it.

I am curious, are you still living with your parents after this incident?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and russ_watters
kuruman said:
Also, if you didn't hit the table hard enough to damage your hands, it's very likely that you didn't hit the table hard enough to damage it or what's underneath it.
Heh, good point; if you did a body-slam hard enough, directly on a 2x6 joist, it'd be bones snapping, not the joist.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog
russ_watters said:
There shouldn't be anything you can do with your body weight alone that can damage the floor -- even if you fall hard enough to injure yourself (like falling off a stepladder). Certainly not in a different place, not directly underneath.

No, you can't damage the floor just by pounding your fists on the dinner table.
Thanks for the comments/feedback. It's good to get this perspective!

a.) I think I'd add that it wasn't just my arms pounding the table, but as I said, I purposely lifted up my body to a standing position almost and "dropped"/flopped with accelerated downward force my upper body onto the table (with the arms being the contact point). AND, it was somewhat unevenly distributed. If you imagine a rectangular table, the pounding was more on the left half and closer to the bottom corner. So the force wasn't aimed at the center, but more so toward the left bottom portion (although, not entirely in that tiny section, as my arms covered some of the upper right and slightly center positions too).

b.) I wondered about the table absorbing shock. Would a table absorb this shock and kind of diminish (maybe "spread out) it's effect OR could actually be an amplifying force and increase the force going into the floor/ground? In other words, if I punched a guy with my fists, that's one thing. But, what if I punched him wearing brass/metal knuckles? That would hurt more, because the metal knuckles amplify the force, no? We have very sturdy metal legs to this table. So could the table + metal legs (+ me pounding it from a non-centralized position - more towards the bottom left side) = a stronger force somehow that ripples into the floor and damages the beams/joists, etc, underneath?

c.) OR, do you think housing materials are just to strong and can still absorb this with no problem.
 
kuruman said:
Also, if you didn't hit the table hard enough to damage your hands, it's very likely that you didn't hit the table hard enough to damage it or what's underneath it.

I am curious, are you still living with your parents after this incident?
I didn't damage my heads, but the key is that I wasn't "hitting/pounding" with my hand/arm strength.

Rather, I lifted up my upper-body and let it fall (I think even accelerating the force by "throwing my weight down fast/hard) on the the table very hard. My hands/arms were more like the "contact points" from which the force was released. But, I generated my force from rising up and accelerating downward with my entire upper-body vs. just standing still and pounding the table usually simply arm strength if that makes sense.

But, yes, no damage to my arms/hands. Table has metal reinforcing bars underneath it that are very thick and very strong metal legs too, so I'm not surprised that didn't break. And, yeah, I'll be with parents until end of March of next year. I "made up" with them and they understand my anger, b/c they realize how stupid it was to go out during that holiday time. One of the worst times really and I'm glad we've had no symptoms.
 
Umm @kyphysics I for one think that nope @russ_watters is right ##-## a full-beam housing joist is way stronger than a human radius or ulna, and in a house, its placement in the floor is much more solid than that of an angry man's arms pounding on the table.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
kyphysics said:
I didn't damage my heads, but the key is that I wasn't "hitting/pounding" with my hand/arm strength.

Rather, I lifted up my upper-body and let it fall
Nothing you have said here was ambiguous in your fist post, so saying it again doesn't change anything. I don't understand why you seem to be confused. Let me try to simplify. Which scenario involves more energy transfer at impact?:
1. Your body falling 0.3m.
2. Your body falling 2m.

And swinging your arms doesn't change anything either, unless you were able to swing them fast enough that the impact threw you against the ceiling.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and sysprog
  • #10
First, if you are angry enough to think you might have done damage to a house, you need to seriously consider anger management. Hoping this will get better on its own is not a good plan.

Second, Russ is right. Saying it again doesn't change anything.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sysprog

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K