Could someone help me study this cyclic process of an ideal gas?

Click For Summary
In this discussion, participants analyze a cyclic process involving an ideal gas, focusing on calculating the system's entropy change (ΔS), total work done, and the surroundings' entropy change. They establish that ΔS for the system is zero over the complete cycle, but recognize that during the irreversible adiabatic step, the system's entropy must increase. The total work done is derived from the net work across the three transformations, with specific calculations for each segment. Participants debate the nature of heat transfer (Qh) and its implications for the surroundings' entropy changes, ultimately concluding that the total entropy of the universe increases slightly due to the irreversible process. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the distinctions between reversible and irreversible processes in thermodynamics.
  • #31
Thermofox said:
Ok.
Q_{2-3}=Q_h
=> ##Q_h= nc_v \Delta T= 0.5 \frac 3 2 8.31 (T_3 - T_2)##, hence $$ T_2 = \frac {nc_vT_3 - Q} {nc_v}= 150.36 \frac J K$$

If I use this temperature I obtain that ##\Delta S_{4-2}= -11\frac J K##
=>##\Delta S_{1-2}= 0.41\frac J K##
That sounds right to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Philip Koeck said:
That sounds right to me.
This means That the entropy of the universe increased by 0.41, right?
I found ##\Delta S_{2-3,sys}= 4.16 \frac J K## and ##\Delta S_{3-1,sys}= -4.56\frac J K##
If I sum them I obtain that ##\Delta S_{sys}=0.01 \frac J K##, but I think I can consider this as an error of approximation.
Moreover does this mean that ##\Delta S_{surr.}= - \Delta S_{sys,2-3} + (-\Delta S_{sys, 3-1})= -4.16 + 4.56= 0.40 (\frac J K)##?
 
  • #33
Thermofox said:
This means That the entropy of the universe increased by 0.41, right?
I found ##\Delta S_{2-3,sys}= 4.16 \frac J K## and ##\Delta S_{3-1,sys}= -4.56\frac J K##
If I sum them I obtain that ##\Delta S_{sys}=0.01 \frac J K##, but I think I can consider this as an error of approximation.
Moreover does this mean that ##\Delta S_{surr.}= - \Delta S_{sys,2-3} + (-\Delta S_{sys, 3-1})= -4.16 + 4.56= 0.40 (\frac J K)##?
Yes that sounds reasonable.
Without rounding errors the entropy for the system should be unchanged after one cycle, whereas the entropy of the surroundings should have increased (by about 0.41 J/K)
 
  • #34
Ok, now I feel like I have a better understanding of all of this. Thanks a lot!
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller and Philip Koeck
  • #35
Thermofox said:
Ok, now I feel like I have a better understanding of all of this. Thanks a lot!
I have a follow-up question (also to @Chestermiller):

W1-2 has to be the same as -Qh so that ΔU becomes zero for a complete cycle.

If, however, I insist on calculating W1-2 as Pext ΔV I'm a bit stuck.
With Pext equal to P2, the internal pressure in state 2 (which seemed the obvious choice to me), I get only about half of -890 J.
Surely Pext can't be higher than P2.
 
  • #36
Philip Koeck said:
I have a follow-up question (also to @Chestermiller):

W1-2 has to be the same as -Qh so that ΔU becomes zero for a complete cycle.
Philip Koeck said:
I have a follow-up question (also to @Chestermiller):

W1-2 has to be the same as -Qh so that ΔU becomes zero for a complete cycle.

If, however, I insist on calculating W1-2 as Pext ΔV I'm a bit stuck.
With Pext equal to P2, the internal pressure in state 2 (which seemed the obvious choice to me), I get only about half of -890 J.
Surely Pext can't be higher than P2.
Philip Koeck said:
If, however, I insist on calculating W1-2 as Pext ΔV I'm a bit stuck.
With Pext equal to P2, the internal pressure in state 2 (which seemed the obvious choice to me), I get only about half of -890 J.
Surely Pext can't be higher than P2.
Unless you know ##P_{ext}## explicitly for an irreversible expansion or compression, you can not determine the work (without solving the internal Navier Stokes equation, the continuity equation, and the differential thermal energy balances equation simultaneously).
 
  • Like
Likes Philip Koeck

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
840
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
761
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
765
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K