Could someone help me study this cyclic process of an ideal gas?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a cyclic process involving an ideal gas, specifically focusing on the calculations of entropy changes for the system and surroundings, as well as the total work done during the cycle. The problem is situated within the context of thermodynamics, particularly examining concepts related to cyclic processes, entropy, and work done by gases.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of the change in entropy for the system and surroundings, questioning the assumptions made about heat exchange during different transformations.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of irreversible and reversible processes on entropy changes, particularly in relation to the first transformation being adiabatic.
  • There is a focus on clarifying the definitions of heat transfer during the cycle and how it relates to the overall energy balance.
  • Questions arise regarding the interpretation of work done during compression and expansion, as well as the implications of state variables on entropy calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and questioning each other's reasoning. Some have offered clarifications regarding the nature of heat transfer and its impact on entropy changes, while others are still seeking to understand specific calculations related to the surroundings during the reversible steps.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the problem, including the specific conditions of the gas (monoatomic) and the details of the cyclic process (irreversible adiabatic, reversible isovolumetric, and reversible isothermic). There is also mention of the total heat absorbed during the cycle and the need for further calculations to determine specific entropy changes.

  • #31
Thermofox said:
Ok.
Q_{2-3}=Q_h
=> ##Q_h= nc_v \Delta T= 0.5 \frac 3 2 8.31 (T_3 - T_2)##, hence $$ T_2 = \frac {nc_vT_3 - Q} {nc_v}= 150.36 \frac J K$$

If I use this temperature I obtain that ##\Delta S_{4-2}= -11\frac J K##
=>##\Delta S_{1-2}= 0.41\frac J K##
That sounds right to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Philip Koeck said:
That sounds right to me.
This means That the entropy of the universe increased by 0.41, right?
I found ##\Delta S_{2-3,sys}= 4.16 \frac J K## and ##\Delta S_{3-1,sys}= -4.56\frac J K##
If I sum them I obtain that ##\Delta S_{sys}=0.01 \frac J K##, but I think I can consider this as an error of approximation.
Moreover does this mean that ##\Delta S_{surr.}= - \Delta S_{sys,2-3} + (-\Delta S_{sys, 3-1})= -4.16 + 4.56= 0.40 (\frac J K)##?
 
  • #33
Thermofox said:
This means That the entropy of the universe increased by 0.41, right?
I found ##\Delta S_{2-3,sys}= 4.16 \frac J K## and ##\Delta S_{3-1,sys}= -4.56\frac J K##
If I sum them I obtain that ##\Delta S_{sys}=0.01 \frac J K##, but I think I can consider this as an error of approximation.
Moreover does this mean that ##\Delta S_{surr.}= - \Delta S_{sys,2-3} + (-\Delta S_{sys, 3-1})= -4.16 + 4.56= 0.40 (\frac J K)##?
Yes that sounds reasonable.
Without rounding errors the entropy for the system should be unchanged after one cycle, whereas the entropy of the surroundings should have increased (by about 0.41 J/K)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Thermofox
  • #34
Ok, now I feel like I have a better understanding of all of this. Thanks a lot!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chestermiller and Philip Koeck
  • #35
Thermofox said:
Ok, now I feel like I have a better understanding of all of this. Thanks a lot!
I have a follow-up question (also to @Chestermiller):

W1-2 has to be the same as -Qh so that ΔU becomes zero for a complete cycle.

If, however, I insist on calculating W1-2 as Pext ΔV I'm a bit stuck.
With Pext equal to P2, the internal pressure in state 2 (which seemed the obvious choice to me), I get only about half of -890 J.
Surely Pext can't be higher than P2.
 
  • #36
Philip Koeck said:
I have a follow-up question (also to @Chestermiller):

W1-2 has to be the same as -Qh so that ΔU becomes zero for a complete cycle.
Philip Koeck said:
I have a follow-up question (also to @Chestermiller):

W1-2 has to be the same as -Qh so that ΔU becomes zero for a complete cycle.

If, however, I insist on calculating W1-2 as Pext ΔV I'm a bit stuck.
With Pext equal to P2, the internal pressure in state 2 (which seemed the obvious choice to me), I get only about half of -890 J.
Surely Pext can't be higher than P2.
Philip Koeck said:
If, however, I insist on calculating W1-2 as Pext ΔV I'm a bit stuck.
With Pext equal to P2, the internal pressure in state 2 (which seemed the obvious choice to me), I get only about half of -890 J.
Surely Pext can't be higher than P2.
Unless you know ##P_{ext}## explicitly for an irreversible expansion or compression, you can not determine the work (without solving the internal Navier Stokes equation, the continuity equation, and the differential thermal energy balances equation simultaneously).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Philip Koeck

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
952
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
915
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
846
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K