firefox5926
- 3
- 0
my question is would a line of wind turbines have a comparable effect to a wind break in reducing wind velocity
The discussion revolves around the potential use of wind turbines as wind breaks in open farmland, exploring their effectiveness compared to traditional methods such as planting trees or shrubs. Participants examine the implications of using turbines for reducing wind velocity, particularly in agricultural contexts, and consider various factors including cost, aesthetics, and airflow dynamics.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the effectiveness of wind turbines as wind breaks. Multiple competing views remain regarding their practicality, cost-effectiveness, and impact on wind dynamics.
Participants highlight limitations in the discussion, including the need for further clarification on definitions of wind breaks, the dependence on specific conditions for effectiveness, and unresolved questions about the airflow dynamics around turbines and trees.
If that's to what the OP was referring, it's a whole different scale than what came to my mind. I was thinking of the kind we had to cut down on soil erosion in dry times on the farm or minimize snow drifting in winter due to surface winds. Hurricane taming wouldn't work on the same principle (I don't think) because of the sheer vertical area they cover and hurricanes are more susceptible to interference a higher altitudes where the "rim" speed is lower.theOrange said:If it is possible to use wind turbines to reduce the power of a hurricane
Danger said:If that's to what the OP was referring, it's a whole different scale than what came to my mind. I was thinking of the kind we had to cut down on soil erosion in dry times on the farm or minimize snow drifting in winter due to surface winds. Hurricane taming wouldn't work on the same principle (I don't think) because of the sheer vertical area they cover and hurricanes are more susceptible to interference a higher altitudes where the "rim" speed is lower.
Way back in the 1920s, Cypress seedlings were handed out for free by the Department of Agriculture so farmers could plant wind breaks. These formed good wind break hedges that only required to be trimmed once each year. Unfortunately, farmers are busy and kept putting off the inconvenient job of trimming the top of 12 foot high hedges, so the hedges became lines of trees, now between 4 and 8 foot diameter at the base, 100 foot high, dropping big old branches on buildings and equipment. The area under the trees is now bare of other vegetation and clear of low branches, which makes an efficient wind tunnel for wind obstructed by the middle part of the tree.theOrange said:You may be right, either way trees are probably more cost effective.
Yes - one can use tall trees, but at some distance from buildings and equipment. One would need lower shrubs, but also rows of trees.Baluncore said:Where trees are used as wind breaks, the species selected should remain low, such as a shrub, or have foliage that fills the area between the trees as close to the ground as possible.