Coulomb force over Rindler horizon

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the behavior of Coulomb forces in the context of Rindler horizons, particularly involving two rockets carrying positively charged balloons. It establishes that while the crew of the first rocket cannot detect the second rocket when it is below the Rindler horizon, they can still perceive the Coulomb force between the balloons. The conversation further explores the implications of charge transfer from a neutral planet to the balloons and concludes that monopole fields can extend beyond the Rindler horizon, while dipole fields cannot. The discussion also touches on the complexities of electric fields as perceived by observers in different frames of reference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Rindler coordinates and horizons
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law and electric fields
  • Knowledge of general relativity concepts
  • Basic principles of charge conservation and electromagnetic fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Rindler horizons in general relativity
  • Explore the mathematical formulation of electric fields in accelerating frames
  • Investigate the Reissner–Nordström metric and its effects on charged black holes
  • Learn about the behavior of monopole and dipole fields in curved spacetime
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in general relativity and electromagnetism, as well as students and researchers interested in the interactions of charged particles in non-inertial frames.

  • #31
PeterDonis said:
No, their Rindler horizon is the two null lines X=TX=TX = T (the future horizon) and X=−TX=−TX = -T (the past horizon).

I would like do some clarification.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rindler_chart.svg says horizons are half line starting from origin of the IFR. Rindler coordinate has nothing to do with other half part.

In the sense that
sweet springs said:
Events in #2 and #3 can effect on events in #3 Rindler area.
Events in #1 and #4 can not effect on events in #3 Rindler area.
not half lines but full lines of X=T,-T seem to have meanings in IFR. Is there definition on half or full ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
sweet springs said:
I would like do some clarification.

Wikipedia is not a valid source.

sweet springs said:
Is there definition half or full ?

Both meanings could be used; you have to determine which is intended from context.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sweet springs

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K