Coulomb force vs. Pauli principle in atoms

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
Heirot
Messages
145
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In the absence of the Pauli principle, the Coulomb force would not be saturated, and the energy of a system containing N atoms would vary as N^(5/3).

Show that a system of 2N atoms would have an energy lower than that of two N - atom systems.

Homework Equations



E = c * N^(5/3)

The Attempt at a Solution



E(2N) = c * (2N)^(5/3) = c * 2^(5/3) * N^(5/3)
2 * E(N) = 2 * c N^(5/3)

Since, 2^(5/3) > 2, then obviously E(2N) > 2 E(N), contrary to the what had to be shown. Where's the error in my reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heirot said:

Homework Statement



In the absence of the Pauli principle, the Coulomb force would not be saturated, and the energy of a system containing N atoms would vary as N^(5/3).

Show that a system of 2N atoms would have an energy lower than that of two N - atom systems.

Homework Equations



E = c * N^(5/3)

The Attempt at a Solution



E(2N) = c * (2N)^(5/3) = c * 2^(5/3) * N^(5/3)
2 * E(N) = 2 * c N^(5/3)

Since, 2^(5/3) > 2, then obviously E(2N) > 2 E(N), contrary to the what had to be shown. Where's the error in my reasoning?

Is [itex]c[/itex] positive or negative, and why?
 
I can't see how could c be anything but positive due to Coulomb repulsion of like charges.
 
Heirot said:
I can't see how could c be anything but positive due to Coulomb repulsion of like charges.
True, but this is an atom: it has a large positive nuclei
 
But then then energy wouldn't depend on N as N^(5/3) but also as N^2