Coulomb's force - magnitude of the electric force

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The magnitude of the electric force on each charged styrofoam ball is expressed by the formula Fe = mgtanθ / (cosα + sinαtanθ), where θ = arcsin(x2/L) and α = arcsin((y2-y1)/r). The variables x2, y2, x1, and y1 represent the positions of the balls, while r is the distance between them, and L is the length of the string. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using Coulomb's Law and trigonometric principles to derive the electric force, particularly in the context of a physics lab experiment involving charged objects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law for electric force calculations
  • Trigonometric functions, specifically arcsin and tangent
  • Understanding of free body diagrams (FBD) in physics
  • Basic algebra for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Coulomb's Law and its application in electric force calculations
  • Learn how to derive equations using trigonometric identities
  • Study the construction and interpretation of free body diagrams
  • Explore equilibrium conditions in physics problems involving forces
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, particularly those working on electric forces and laboratory experiments involving charged objects, as well as educators looking for practical examples of Coulomb's Law applications.

zachem62
Messages
37
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Show that the magnitude of the electric force on each ball is given by
Fe = mgtanθ/ (cosα+ sinαtanθ)
where θ = arcsin(x2/L)
α = arcsin((y2-y1)/r)
r = √((x2-x1)^2+(y2-y1)^2)
This is a question from my coulomb's law lab, where 2 styrofoam balls where charged, one was hung on a string and the other was brought closer to it from 20cm away and the change in the hanging ball position was recorded. (x2,y2) is the position of the hanging ball, and (x1,y1) is the position of the other ball that is moving closer to the hanging ball. r is the separation distance between the 2 balls. L is the length of the string that the ball is hung on. If this is not clear enough, please see these links:
question: https://imgur.com/a/IrkZl
diagram: https://imgur.com/a/UzzMu

2. Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am pretty confused about how to approach this problem. I drew the free body diagram for the ball and split the forces into their x and y components so derive Fe, and that hasn't got me anywhere. Whats a better way to do this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
zachem62 said:

Homework Statement


Show that the magnitude of the electric force on each ball is given by
Fe = mgtanθ/ (cosα+ sinαtanθ)
where θ = arcsin(x2/L)
α = arcsin((y2-y1)/r)
r = √((x2-x1)^2+(y2-y1)^2)
This is a question from my coulomb's law lab, where 2 styrofoam balls where charged, one was hung on a string and the other was brought closer to it from 20cm away and the change in the hanging ball position was recorded. (x2,y2) is the position of the hanging ball, and (x1,y1) is the position of the other ball that is moving closer to the hanging ball. r is the separation distance between the 2 balls. L is the length of the string that the ball is hung on. If this is not clear enough, please see these links:
question: https://imgur.com/a/IrkZl
diagram: https://imgur.com/a/UzzMu

2. Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am pretty confused about how to approach this problem. I drew the free body diagram for the ball and split the forces into their x and y components so derive Fe, and that hasn't got me anywhere. Whats a better way to do this?
You didn't include Coulomb's Law as the main Relevant Equation, but maybe just because you figured it was obvious. :smile:

So you get Fe from Coulomb's Law and the separation distance r, right? Once you have that, the rest is just trigonometry to solve the sum of the forces on the hanging ball in the x & y directions are each zero. Can you show us your work so far?
 
berkeman said:
You didn't include Coulomb's Law as the main Relevant Equation, but maybe just because you figured it was obvious. :smile:

So you get Fe from Coulomb's Law and the separation distance r, right? Once you have that, the rest is just trigonometry to solve the sum of the forces on the hanging ball in the x & y directions are each zero. Can you show us your work so far?
You're right it all comes down to trig and sum of forces in x and y directions. I figured it out now. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
zachem62 said:
You're right it all comes down to trig and sum of forces in x and y directions. I figured it out now. Thanks.
Great! Looks like a fun problem. :smile:
 
berkeman said:
You didn't include Coulomb's Law as the main Relevant Equation, but maybe just because you figured it was obvious. :smile:

So you get Fe from Coulomb's Law and the separation distance r, right? Once you have that, the rest is just trigonometry to solve the sum of the forces on the hanging ball in the x & y directions are each zero. Can you show us your work so far?
Years later, I'm stuck on this very problem. I'm confused about how to derive the above equation for Fe from Coulomb's Law. How can I use Coulomb's Law if I don't know the charges?

I think I understand the trig aspect, and I know I could simply plug values into the given equation for Fe, but that seems like skipping ahead. The lab says specifically to include detailed derivation steps and supporting diagrams.

I also tried breaking the forces into x and y components but I don't think I can find the tension force without knowing Fe, unless T=mg? I've been spinning my wheels for a couple days now, any help is appreciated!
 
ngiro0862 said:
How can I use Coulomb's Law if I don't know the charges?
Just leave the charge as a variable Q for now...
ngiro0862 said:
I also tried breaking the forces into x and y components but I don't think I can find the tension force without knowing Fe, unless T=mg?
Do you have the same FBD as the original problem? If Ball #1 is below Ball #2, it will unload some of the string tension according the angles...

1641511598586.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ngiro0862
berkeman said:
Just leave the charge as a variable Q for now...

Do you have the same FBD as the original problem? If Ball #1 is below Ball #2, it will unload some of the string tension according the angles...

View attachment 295207
Yeah it's identical! I thought that was the case, but I was trying anything.
 
Can you show your work so far so that we can check it?
 
  • #10
IMG_20220106_192810.jpg
IMG_20220106_192823.jpg

Hopefully that's clear enough. The last bit is where I went ahead assuming T=mg.
 
  • #11
ngiro0862 said:
Hopefully that's clear enough.
No sorry, dim cell phone pictures are no help at all.

Please type your work into the forum Edit window to post it. For math equations you can click into the "LaTeX Guide" link below the Edit window to see the basics of posting math on Internet forums (it's a good general skill to have, not just for the PF). :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
  • #12
Gotcha sorry, first time.

I know ##m = 0.7g, L = 0.32m, \text{and } g=9.8~\rm{m/s^2}##.

I can obviously solve ##mg=6.9*10^{-3}N##.

Using data points ##X1=0.009m, Y1=-0.024m, X2= 0.050m, Y2=-0.019m## I can solve for $$\begin{align}
\theta & = \sin^{-1}\left( \frac {X2} L \right) \nonumber \\
& = 0.16 rad \nonumber
\end{align}$$
$$\begin{align}
\alpha & = \sin^{-1}\left( \frac {Y2 - Y1} r \right) \nonumber \\
& = 0.085 rad \nonumber
\end{align}$$
$$\begin{align}
r & = \sqrt {(X2 - X1)^2+(Y2-Y1)^2} \nonumber \\
& = 0.059 m \nonumber
\end{align}$$

Because the system is in equilibrium the magnitudes $$T_x =T\sin\theta = Fe_x = Fe\cos\alpha$$ and $$T_y = T\cos\theta = mg - Fe_y = mg - Fe\sin\alpha$$

As for the derivation from Coulomb's Law I am quite lost. Obviously I have the value r, which is the distance between the charges, but I still have two unknowns, Fe and Q, and I don't see a substitution, since T is also unknown.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff and berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K