Coulomb's Law and simple harmonic motion

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a charged particle -Q, placed on the perpendicular bisector of two fixed identical charges +q, exhibits simple harmonic motion when its initial displacement x is small compared to the distance d between the fixed charges. Participants emphasize the need to derive the net force acting on -Q and show that it is proportional to x, akin to Hooke's law for springs. The conversation suggests starting with the force equation and then applying the small x approximation to simplify the analysis. Additionally, the period of motion and the speed of -Q at the midpoint are key points of interest. The overall goal is to establish the conditions under which -Q's motion can be classified as simple harmonic.
mickellowery
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two identical particles, each having a charge of +q are fixed in space and separated by a distance d. A third particle with charge -Q is free to move and lies initially at rest on the perpendicular bisector of the two fixed charges a distance x from the midpoint between the two fixed charges. Show that if x is small compared with d, the motion of -Q is simple harmonic along the perpendicular bisector. Determine the period of that motion. How fast will the charge -Q be moving when it is at the midpoint between the two fixed charges if it is initially released at a distance a << d from the midpoint?


Homework Equations


Fe= ke\frac{(q_1)(q_2)}{r^2}
-kx=max I'm not completely sure if I need this one, but the problem wants me to show that -Q is simple harmonic so I was thinking that I might need to set these equal to each other somehow, but I'm absolutely lost as to where to go.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
mickellowery said:
Fe= ke\frac{(q_1)(q_2)}{r^2}
-kx=max I'm not completely sure if I need this one, but the problem wants me to show that -Q is simple harmonic so I was thinking that I might need to set these equal to each other somehow, but I'm absolutely lost as to where to go.

I believe your interim goal is to show that the net force is proportional to x, for small x. Because if that's the case, the force resembles that of a spring (force being proportional to x).

I suggest first finding the equation for the net force on -Q. (First without making any assumptions.)

Secondly, once you have your net force equation, make the assumption that x is small compared to d. See what happens. :wink:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
12K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K