Coulomb's Law: Is It Correct to Use r12 Instead of r21 for Attractive Force?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Coulomb's Law, specifically the notation used for the distance vectors between two point charges and the implications for calculating the forces they exert on each other. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the correct use of the distance vectors r12 and r21 in the context of attractive and repulsive forces.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the naming conventions for the unit vectors r12 and r21, questioning whether the notation affects the interpretation of the forces. There is a discussion about the nature of the forces (attractive vs. repulsive) and how the signs of the charges influence the force calculations.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify the correct notation and the mathematical representation of the forces. Some participants have provided corrections and elaborations on the equations, while others have acknowledged the need for precision in the notation used. There is an ongoing exploration of how the signs of the charges affect the force, with no explicit consensus reached on the implications of the notation.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with attachments that contain additional information, which may influence their understanding of the problem. The discussion also highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the signs and magnitudes in Coulomb's Law without resolving the underlying confusion regarding the notation.

logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Revered members,
Please see my both attachments.

Homework Equations



F21 = (q1q2/4∏ε0r122)*r12cap(unit vector)
Is it wrong to use r12 instead of r21 for F21. Because my second attachment uses r21 for F21 and r12 or F12. I am confused. Please help which is correct.

The Attempt at a Solution



 

Attachments

  • title.jpg
    title.jpg
    35.3 KB · Views: 15,431
  • title1.jpg
    title1.jpg
    49.6 KB · Views: 3,463
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
logearav said:

Homework Statement



Revered members,
Please see my both attachments.

no attachment
 
Sorry cupid.callin. Now i have incorporated the attachments.
 
It depends how the forces and the unit vectors r12 and r21 were named. The left poster calls the unit vector pointing from 1 to 2 by [itex]\hat{r}_{12}[/itex], in the right one it is denoted by [itex]\hat{r}_{21}[/itex].

One is sure: the Coulomb force a charge exerts on an other charge acts in the line that connects them and repulsive when the charges are of the same sign.

If the position of two point charges are given with the vectors r1 and r2 then the force [itex]\vec{F_{21}}[/itex] exerted on charge 2 by charge 1 is

[tex]\vec F_{21}=k\frac{Q_1 Q_2}{(\vec {r_2}-\vec {r_1})^3}(\vec {r_2}-\vec {r_1})[/tex].

You can call the vector pointing from 1 to 2 by [itex]\vec r_{12}[/itex]. The unit vector pointing from1 to 2 is

[tex]\hat r_{12}=\frac{\vec {r_2}-\vec {r_1}}{|\vec {r_2}-\vec {r_1}|}=\frac{\vec r_{12}}{r_{12}}[/tex]

With this notation, the Coulomb force on charge 2 exerted by charge 1 is

[tex]\vec F_{21}=k\frac{Q_1 Q_2}{r_{12}^2}\hat r_{12}[/tex].
 
Correction:
Instead of
ehild said:
[tex]\vec F_{21}=k\frac{Q_1 Q_2}{(\vec {r_2}-\vec {r_1})^3}(\vec {r_2}-\vec {r_1})[/tex].

[tex]\vec F_{21}=k\frac{Q_1 Q_2}{|\vec {r_2}-\vec {r_1}|^3}(\vec {r_2}-\vec {r_1})[/tex]

ehild
 
Thanks for the help ehild.
Btw, Both your quoted equation and the reply equation in your last reply was same.
 
I mistakenly used parentheses () in the quoted equation: It has to be magnitude instead ||.

ehild
 
Thanks again. If charges are opposite, then attractive force exists. Will the coulomb law take a negative sign? That is F = -KQ1Q2/r^2 ?
 
logearav said:
Thanks again. If charges are opposite, then attractive force exists. Will the coulomb law take a negative sign? That is F = -KQ1Q2/r^2 ?


NO. One of the Q-s is negative, the other one is positive. Their product is negative so the force is negative. The law is the same for any Q1, Q2.

[tex]\vec F_{21}=k\frac{Q_1 Q_2}{r_{12}^2}\hat r_{12}[/tex]

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K