Coulomb's Law Problem- Why is this incorrect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcjochim07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb's law Law
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving Coulomb's Law, specifically calculating the force on a 1.0 nC charge in a system of three charges arranged in an equilateral triangle. Participants are examining the interactions between the charges and the resulting forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Coulomb's Law and the significance of action-reaction pairs. There is an exploration of how the forces from the 2.0 nC and -2.0 nC charges interact with the 1.0 nC charge, questioning whether these forces cancel each other out.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering insights and suggestions for visualizing the problem through free body diagrams. There is a recognition that not all forces cancel out, leading to further exploration of the net force on the 1.0 nC charge.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with a specific arrangement of charges and are awaiting visual confirmation of the setup. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the interactions due to the presence of both attractive and repulsive forces.

bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0
charges.jpg

Homework Statement


What is the force F on the 1.0 nC charge in the figure? Give your answer as a magnitude and a direction.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Applying coulomb's law for the 1.0 nC charge and the 2.0 nc Charge: F= kq1q2/r^2 F=(8.99e9)(1.0e-9C)(2.0e-9C)/(.01m)2
F= 1.798e-4 N

Fx= (1.798e-4)(cos60) = 8.99e-5 N
Fy=(1.798e-4)(sin60) = 1.56 e-4 N

and If I do the action reaction pair between the 1.0 nC charge and the negative 2.0 nC charge, I will get the same magnitudes with opposite signs.

So all together, I come up with a net force of zero, but my computer says this is wrong. What am I doing incorrectly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I can't see the picture yet because it's still pending approval, and I'm not the best at electricity problems, but I do know that just because the action reaction pair is the same (which it always is because of Newton's third law) , that doesn't mean that the net force is zero. Sorry I can't help more until I can see the picture for myself!
 
Maybe if I describe it:

There are three charges arranged in an equilateral triangle with distance 1.0 cm between each of the charges as the "sides." The top charge is 1.0 nC, the bottom left charge is 2.0 nC, and the bottom right charge is -2.0 nC. Each of the angles in this "triangle" are 60 degrees. The question asks what is the force on the top 1.0 nC charge.
 
Try to think about what is happening. You know that the charge will be going towards the negative 2nC charge because opposites attract.

I'd suggest drawing a free body diagram :)
 
Ok, I just did that, but I'm still thinking that the +2.0 nC repels equally as much as the -2.0nC attracts, so don't those cancel out when you sum up all the forces on the 1.0 nC charge on both x &y? Don't the 2.0 nC & -2.0 nC exert the same magnitude force, just in opposite directions?
 
Some forces will cancel out, but not all of them. Look at your free body diagram. The only way the net force could be zero is if all the arrows pointed in opposite directions. However, I do believe that some arrows will be pointing in the same direction. Think about it
 
Ok, yes I see it. So the total force would be 2(8.99e-5)= 1.80 e-4 N

Part B:

Assume the x-axis is directed from the 2.0nC charge to the -2.0 nC charge. Give the direction.

So, the direction is zero degrees from the x-axis, correct? That's what it looks like on my diagram.
 
I believe so. However, I don't pretend to be an expert at using Coulomb's Law, as it's been several months since I've seen these kinds of problems. From what my diagram looks like, I can only assume that it'd be zero degrees from the x-axis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K