Countable Set Proof: Proving A is Countable

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Set
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating that an infinite subset A of a countable set B is also countable. The original poster assumes B is countable and seeks to prove the countability of A through contradiction and the properties of bijections.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of assuming A is uncountable and question the validity of this assumption. There are discussions about leveraging the bijection from N to B to establish a similar mapping to A. Some participants suggest considering the "gaps" in the mapping and how to address them.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants questioning the necessity of certain mappings and the definitions involved in proving countability. There is a focus on understanding the relationship between the elements of A and B, as well as the implications of the bijection.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that A is an infinite subset of B, which is countable, and discuss the implications of this relationship. There is an emphasis on the definitions of countability and the requirements for establishing a bijection.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Assume B is a countable set. Thus, there exists [itex]f:\mathbb{N}→B[/itex]
which is 1-1 and onto Let [itex]A{\subseteq}B[/itex] be an infinite subset of B.
Show that A is countable.

The Attempt at a Solution


Lets assume for contradiction that A has an uncountable number of elements.
This would imply that A has elements that are not in B. But this is a contradiction because all elements in A are in B. Therefore A is countable.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:
Lets assume for contradiction that A has an uncountable number of elements.
This would imply that A has elements that are not in B.

your reason??
 
If all elements of A are in B, and if B is countable then A is countable.
 
try to look at the problem this way:

you are given (for free) a bijection f:N→B.

you want to leverage that to a bijection g:N→A.

f looks like this:

1→b1
2→b2
3→b3
...
k→bk
...

now A is a subset of B, so every element of A is already listed on the right. can you think of something to do with the "gaps"?
 
can I just assign some function to N that takes it to A, so there is no gaps.
 
cragar said:
can I just assign some function to N that takes it to A, so there is no gaps.

well, yes, that is what you want to do, but how? you need to indicate an algorithm of some sort.

note that the bijection f linearly orders B.

therefore it makes sense to speak of: the first element of B such that..., the second element of B such that...

can you continue?
 
why do i need N-->A why can't I just have A go to a subset of N, why does it need to be onto.
 
well, that depends.

what are you trying to prove? what is the definition of what you are trying to prove?

what does it MEAN to say "B is countable"?

are you convinced, right down to your curly toes, that what you are saying is true? do you think the theroem is true? why, or why not?

as for your suggestion, the map f:R→N given by f(x) = 1 certainly maps R to a subset of N, does this mean R is countable?
 
A is also an infinite set and it is a subset of B, and B is countable.
On your list that you gave on post #4 , why can't I just make the first natural go to the first element of A and then keep matching them up.
 
  • #10
cragar said:
A is also an infinite set and it is a subset of B, and B is countable.
On your list that you gave on post #4 , why can't I just make the first natural go to the first element of A and then keep matching them up.

because until you know that A is countable, "the first element of A" doesn't even make sense.

however, "the first element of B that is also in A" DOES make sense, because we already know that B is countable.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K