Counting Cosets in Abstract Algebra | Pinter's Self Study

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sdembi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosets partitions
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
sdembi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am doing self study of Abstract Algebra from Pinter.
My doubt is regarding Chap 13 Counting Cosets:
A coset contains all products of the form "ah" where a belongs to G and h belongs to H where H is a subgroup of G. So each coset should contain the number of elements in H. Now the number of cosets should be the number of elements in G since each element of G is used to construct a coset. So the number of elements in all cosets should be number of elements in G*Number of elements in H - But the family of cosets is a partition of G and should have the same number of elements of G... there is definitely something wrong in the second-third line of this argument... but I am not able to pin it down
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sdembi said:
Hi,
Now the number of cosets should be the number of elements in G since each element of G is used to construct a coset.

Do two different elements of G necessarily construct two different cosets ?

For example, suppose the two elements of [itex]G[/itex] are [itex]h1, h2[/itex] and that [itex]h_1 \in H[/itex] and [itex]h_2 \in H[/itex].
 
Thanks - The coset of h1 would be the set of elements h1*h and that of h2 would be h2*h for all h belonging to H - Not sure why they should not be different.
I am not able to understand why the number of cosets should not be equal to the number of elements in the set G. Am sure I'm missing something very basic.
 
Understood - Thanks a ton...