Counting Measure Homework: Does fn(x) Converge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter onthetopo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Counting Measure
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 4K views
onthetopo
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the measure space {X,S,u} where u is the counting measure
X=(1,2,3,..}
S= all subsets of X
fn(x)=[tex]\chi[/tex]{1,2,,,..n}(x) where [tex]\chi[/tex] is the characteristic (indicator) function.

Does fn(x) converge
a.pointwise
b.almost uniformly
c.in measure


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


My guess would be
a.pointwise.yes, since it goes eventually to 1 , but it's hard to demonstrate this
b. almost uniformly : yes?
c. in measure: yes? follows directly from b if the answer to b is yes
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) Yes. Take [tex]x \in X[/tex]. It shouldn't too difficult to show that eventually [tex]|f_n ( x ) - 1 | = 0[/tex].
b) See (c)
c) No. It's easy to see that the only possible limit is [tex]f\equiv1[/tex]. Now, for any [tex]1>\varepsilon>0, n \in \mathbb{N}[/tex], [tex]\{ | f_n - 1 | > \varepsilon \} = \{ n + 1, n + 2, \ldots \}[/tex]. What is the measure of this set? What does this say about almost uniform convergence?
 
rochfor1 said:
a) Yes. Take [tex]x \in X[/tex]. It shouldn't too difficult to show that eventually [tex]|f_n ( x ) - 1 | = 0[/tex].
b) See (c)
c) No. It's easy to see that the only possible limit is [tex]f\equiv1[/tex]. Now, for any [tex]1>\varepsilon>0, n \in \mathbb{N}[/tex], [tex]\{ | f_n - 1 | > \varepsilon \} = \{ n + 1, n + 2, \ldots \}[/tex]. What is the measure of this set? What does this say about almost uniform convergence?

I think the only problem is that we have to find the cardinality of (n+1,n+2,n+3...) as n goes to infinity. As n goes to infinity, there is no number larger than n and in fact no n+1,n+2...can exist?
 
That's not a very precise way to think about it. Think about it...without a doubt [tex]n\to\infty[/tex], but at any "stage" of this limit, [tex]n<\infty[/tex] so the set I wrote about is well-defined, and can in fact be mapped bijectively to the natural numbers. What does that imply about its cardnality?
 
I completely understand the solution now.

One last question
How to prove that the metric space (L,d)
where L=all measurable functions
d(f,g)=[tex]\int{\frac{|f-g|}{1+|f-g|}[/tex] is complete?

I really have no idea how to show this since I have to show that the limit of ARBITRARY cauchy sequence is another measurable function. I think it is very difficult.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, my bad (X,S,u) is a FINITE measure space and L is the set of FINITE measurable functions. no information other than that.
no mention of lebesgue measure or borel set
 
That helps. Otherwise you wouldn't have a metric. Now your metric is equivalent to the L_1 metric, isn't it? Sorry, it's been a long time since my Real Analysis classes and I don't have this stuff at the tip of my tongue anymore.