Prove the typewriter sequence does not converge pointwise.

  • Thread starter Thread starter wrolsr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the typewriter sequence of functions defined on the interval [0,1], specifically the functions f1 through f7, which are characteristic functions of various subintervals. It is established that the sequence fn does not converge pointwise for any x in [0,1]. Furthermore, this sequence serves as a counterexample to the assertion that non-negative functions fn converge to a function f Lebesgue almost everywhere under certain conditions. The key takeaway is that the behavior of the typewriter sequence illustrates the failure of pointwise convergence despite the conditions set forth.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of characteristic functions and their properties.
  • Familiarity with Lebesgue integration and measure theory.
  • Knowledge of pointwise convergence and its implications in functional analysis.
  • Ability to interpret and analyze sequences of functions graphically.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of characteristic functions in measure theory.
  • Learn about Lebesgue convergence theorems and their applications.
  • Explore counterexamples in functional analysis, focusing on convergence issues.
  • Investigate graphical methods for analyzing sequences of functions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of analysis, and anyone interested in the nuances of convergence in functional sequences, particularly in the context of measure theory and Lebesgue integration.

wrolsr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
(Typewriter sequence) Consider the following sequence of functions on [0,1]. Let f1= X[0, 1\2], f2= X[1\2, 1], f3= X[0, 1\4], f4= X[1/4, 1\2], f5= X[1\2, 3/4], f6= X[3/4, 1], f7= X[0, 1\8], etc. Where X is the Characteristic function.

(a) Prove that fn does not converge for any x in [0,1].

(b) Show that this sequence of functions is a counterexample to the statement:
If for all n, fn and f are non-negative functions on E (with λ(E)<∞) and for all A contained in E, ∫A[\sub]fn dλ, then fn converges to f Lebesgue almost everywhere.
Attempt at solution: assume that lim n→∞fn(y)=0, which means that for all ϵ>0 there is an N, such that for all n > N, fn(y)<ϵ.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
wrolsr said:
(Typewriter sequence) Consider the following sequence of functions on [0,1]. Let f1= X[0, 1\2], f2= X[1\2, 1], f3= X[0, 1\4], f4= X[1/4, 1\2], f5= X[1\2, 3/4], f6= X[3/4, 1], f7= X[0, 1\8], etc. Where X is the Characteristic function.

(a) Prove that fn does not converge for any x in [0,1].

(b) Show that this sequence of functions is a counterexample to the statement:
If for all n, fn and f are non-negative functions on E (with λ(E)<∞) and for all A contained in E, ∫A[\sub]fn dλ, then fn converges to f Lebesgue almost everywhere.



Attempt at solution: assume that lim n→∞fn(y)=0, which means that for all ϵ>0 there is an N, such that for all n > N, fn(y)<ϵ.


That's not much of an attempt. Can you explain in words why fn does not converge for any x in [0,1]?
 
I suggest drawing the graph for each of the functions and you should be able to see what is happening and why fn(x) does not converge for any x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K