Coupled 2nd-Order Non-linear ODEs

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving coupled second-order non-linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) represented by the equations \(\ddot{\phi} + 2\left(\frac{\cos \theta}{\sin \theta}\right) \dot{\theta}\dot{\phi} =0\) and \(\ddot{\theta} - \sin \theta \cos \theta \dot{\phi^2} =0\). The user applies the chain rule to manipulate the first equation, leading to the conclusion that \(\dot{\phi} \propto \frac{1}{\sin^2 \theta}\). However, substituting this result into the second ODE yields a complex expression \(\ddot{\theta} \propto \frac{\cos \theta}{\sin^3 \theta}\), which remains unresolved. The user seeks further insights on this substitution and its implications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus
  • Knowledge of non-linear dynamics
  • Experience with differential equations in physics or engineering contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for solving coupled non-linear ODEs
  • Learn about perturbation methods for non-linear systems
  • Explore numerical methods for ODEs, such as Runge-Kutta
  • Investigate the implications of variable substitutions in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in applied mathematics, physics, or engineering who are dealing with non-linear dynamics and require a deeper understanding of solving coupled second-order ODEs.

cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,197
Reaction score
38

Homework Statement



I'm trying to solve the equations:

[tex]\ddot{\phi} + 2\left(\frac{\cos \theta}{\sin \theta}\right) \dot{\theta}\dot{\phi} =0[/tex]​

and

[tex]\ddot{\theta} - \sin \theta \cos \theta \dot{\phi^2} =0[/tex]​

for [itex]\theta(\lambda), \phi(\lambda)[/itex] where the dots represent differentiation w.r.t the parameter [itex]\lambda[/itex].

Homework Equations



Chain rule, other differentiation tricks

The Attempt at a Solution

I've tried to tackle the first equation by writing:

[tex]\frac{\cos \theta}{\sin \theta} \dot{\theta} = \frac{1}{\sin \theta} \frac{d}{d\theta}(\sin \theta) \dot{\theta} = \frac{d}{d\lambda}[\ln (\sin \theta) ][/tex]​

I'm wondering if it's correct to do that. It seems to follow from the chain rule, but I'm not sure. If so, then the equation becomes:

[tex]\frac{\ddot{\phi}}{\dot{\phi}} = -2\frac{d}{d\lambda}[\ln (\sin \theta) ][/tex]

[tex]\frac{1}{\dot{\phi}}\frac{d \dot{\phi}}{d\lambda} = -2\frac{d}{d\lambda}[\ln (\sin \theta) ][/tex]

[tex]\frac{d \ln ( \dot{\phi})}{d\lambda} = -2\frac{d}{d\lambda}[\ln (\sin \theta) ][/tex]​

Then I integrated both sides w.r.t. lambda:

[tex]\ln ( \dot{\phi}) = - 2\ln (\sin \theta) + \mathrm{~const.}[/tex]

[tex]\dot{\phi} \propto \frac{1}{\sin^2 \theta}[/tex]​

Then I tried substituting this result into the second ODE, but it gave me:

[tex]\ddot{\theta} \propto \frac{\cos \theta}{\sin^3 \theta}[/tex]​

which I don't know what to do with.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Just bumping the thread. Any insight you might have, esp. regarding the last line, would be most helpful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K