News Court strikes down Internet porn law

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Internet Law
AI Thread Summary
A recent federal court ruling in Philadelphia invalidated a 1998 law that criminalized allowing minors access to "harmful" online material, emphasizing that parents should use software filters instead of government censorship to protect children. The judge argued that limiting free speech in the name of protecting minors could ultimately harm them as they mature into adults with rights to free expression. The discussion reflects a divide on the implications of this ruling, with some advocating for parental education and involvement in children's internet usage rather than government intervention. Concerns were raised about the potential for pornography to influence minors' understanding of sex, with arguments both for and against the idea that exposure to porn could lead to negative behaviors or addictions. The debate also touched on the broader implications of censorship, with participants expressing that limiting access to adult content could infringe on personal freedoms. Overall, the conversation highlighted the complexities surrounding internet regulation, parental responsibility, and the societal impacts of pornography.
  • #51
ShawnD said:
Historically women would have babies as young as age 12; 15 would be more usual, and 18 is like "jesus what the hell is she waiting for? serpents in her vagina!"
If you're trying to stop people under the age of 18 from thinking about sex, you're basically fighting a battle against nature itself, and that's a battle humans can't possibly win.


You're exactly right. Kids need to be educated on things like safe sex, pregnancy, and STDs. Ironically it's the bible-thumpers fighting against porn who also encourage abstinence-only educated in schools which doesn't teach any of the three things listed above.


It's a grey area. Although kids will not listen to your rules, they will at least understand that what they are doing is somehow seen as wrong, in your opinion. If you're a reasonable parent who at least has a somewhat pleasant relationship (the kid will tell you 1% of everything as opposed to telling you absolutely nothing), they might understand why you don't want them to watch porn, but they'll do it anyway. If you're one hard ass parents that dictates every aspect of their life, they will watch it just to be different from you, and they'll grow up thinking that porn is right and you are wrong. Authoritarian parenting often leads to really screwed up kids. Likewise, overly lax parenting leads to the same screwed up kids.

The more rules you try to put on kids, the more they will try to break those rules. If you don't have any rules, the kids have no boundries and they turn into those crackheads who sleep at the bus station. If you have too many rules, they'll rebel against everything you do, even the good parts, and they'll also turn into crackheads.
Now that's a good parent.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
ShawnD said:
Historically women would have babies as young as age 12; 15 would be more usual, and 18 is like "jesus what the hell is she waiting for? serpents in her vagina!"
If you're trying to stop people under the age of 18 from thinking about sex, you're basically fighting a battle against nature itself, and that's a battle humans can't possibly win.
Let me rephrase that. Kids shouldn't be contemplating having sex. Of course they're going to think about it. If a parent is going to have healthy discussions about sex, then they need to think about those discussions. Hopefully, as you expressed, those discussions and impressions will be positive, though realistic and informed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
24
Views
9K
Replies
57
Views
7K
Replies
29
Views
10K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top