Undergrad Covariant derivative of field strength tensor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the covariant derivative of the field strength tensor, specifically addressing the equation \(D_\rho B_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\rho B_{\mu\nu}\) as presented in the paper "1008.4884". The user encounters discrepancies in their calculations, particularly when applying the covariant derivative \(D_\rho B_{\mu\nu}=(\partial_\rho+i g B_\rho)(\partial_\mu B_\nu-\partial_\nu B_\mu)\). The key takeaway is that the field strength tensor transforms according to the adjoint representation, which is crucial for understanding the implications of the structure constants being zero for Abelian groups.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of covariant derivatives in gauge theory
  • Familiarity with field strength tensors in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of the adjoint representation in group theory
  • Basic concepts of Abelian and non-Abelian gauge groups
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of covariant derivatives in gauge theories
  • Explore the properties of field strength tensors in both Abelian and non-Abelian contexts
  • Investigate the implications of the adjoint representation in quantum field theory
  • Review the role of structure constants in gauge theories, focusing on Abelian groups
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers focusing on gauge theories and quantum field theory, particularly those working with field strength tensors and covariant derivatives.

d8586
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am struggling to derive the relations on the right hand column of eq.(4) in https://arxiv.org/pdf/1008.4884.pdfEven the easy abelian one (third row)

which is

$$D_\rho B_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\rho B_{\mu\nu}$$

doesn't match my calculation

Since

$$D_\rho B_{\mu\nu}=(\partial_\rho+i g B_\rho)(\partial_\mu B_\nu-\partial_\nu B_\mu)$$

the equation seems to imply that

$$B_\rho (\partial_\mu B_\nu-\partial_\nu B_\mu)=0$$

What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
d8586 said:
What am I missing?

The field tensor transforms according to the adjoint representation, not the fundamental one. The structure constants for an Abelian group are zero.
 
  • Like
Likes d8586
Orodruin said:
The field tensor transforms according to the adjoint representation, not the fundamental one. The structure constants for an Abelian group are zero.

Thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K