MHB COVID-19 in a Small Town: Probability of Infection

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probabilities of COVID-19 infection among a random sample of six residents from a small town where 22% are infected. The probability that exactly two residents are infected is derived using the formula 15p^2(1-p)^4, with p set at 0.22. For the scenario of "at most one" infection, the probabilities for none and exactly one infected are combined, resulting in the formula (1-p)^6 + 6p(1-p)^5. The calculations illustrate how to apply binomial probability principles to determine infection likelihood in small populations. Understanding these probabilities can help in assessing risk in similar community settings.
laprec
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Kindly assist with these questions:
Data showed that 22% of people in a small town was infected with the COVID-19 virus. A random sample of six residents from this town was selected.
1) What is the probability that exactly two of these residents was infected?
2) What is the probability that at most 1 of these residents was infected?
Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If the probability a given person has the virus is p then the probability that person does not have it is 1- p. First imagine putting the six people in a given order. The probability the first person has the virus is p, the probability the next person has the virus is p, the probability the third person does NOT have the virus is 1- p, the probability the fourth person does not is1-p, and the probability the fifth and sixth persons do not is 1-p.

The probability the first two people have the virus and the other four do not, in that order, is $p^2(1-p)^4$.

There are $\frac{6!}{2!4!}= \frac{6(5)}{2}= 15$ different orders of those two people who have the virus and four who do not so the probability two of a random six people have the diease and four do not is $15p^2(1- p)^4$.

In your problem, of course, p= 0.22.

"At most one" means "either one or none". By the same argument as above, the probability none of the people has the virus is $(1- p)^6$ and the probability exactly one has it is $6p(1-p)^5$. Since "none" and "exactly one" are "mutually exclusive", the probability of "at most one" is the sum of those.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top