Create a rational function with the following properties

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on constructing a rational function with specified properties: a horizontal asymptote at y = 2, vertical asymptotes at x = -3 and x = 1, and x-intercepts at -1 and 5. The initial formula presented is y = \frac{2x^2}{(x+3)(x-1)}, which satisfies the horizontal and vertical asymptote conditions. To achieve the desired x-intercepts, the numerator must be adjusted to include factors that yield the specified intercepts, specifically (x + 1)(x - 5). The final rational function can be expressed as y = \frac{2(x + 1)(x - 5)}{(x + 3)(x - 1)}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rational functions
  • Knowledge of asymptotes in calculus
  • Ability to solve polynomial equations
  • Familiarity with the concept of x-intercepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of rational functions in detail
  • Learn how to determine vertical and horizontal asymptotes
  • Explore polynomial factorization techniques
  • Practice solving for x-intercepts in various functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of rational functions and their graphical representations.

Painguy
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
Give a formula for a rational function having the following properties:
• Horizontal Asymptote: y = 2
• Vertical Asymptotes: x = − 3 and 1
• x-intercepts: -1 and 5

Here is what I've done so far

[tex]\frac{2x^2}{(x+3)(x-1)}[/tex]

I basically get stuck when trying to come up with something for the x intercepts. I hope its not something obvious :P. I've been missing a lot of obvious things today haha.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've done well to answer the first two points :smile: Just to expand on the ideas of each point, to have a horizontal asymptote of y=2, the degree of the numerator and denominator need to be equal and the coefficient of the highest power (the constant multiplier of x2) needs to be 2. Basically you've done this already, but to fill out the last point we need to change things a bit of course.

For the third, to find the x-intercepts we always let y=0, right? Ok so we have

[tex]y=\frac{2x^2}{(x+3)(x-1)}[/tex]

so far. If we let y=0 then we can see that to solve for x, it doesn't matter what is in the denominator, all we need to consider is what is in the numerator - or another way you can think about it is that if we multiply through by (x+3)(x-1) on both sides, then the left side stays 0, while the right side cancels the denominator.

So what we have now is 2(something)=0, where that something, when solved, will give us the x-intercepts -1 and 5.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K