Create Composite Ranking of Items Ranked in Multiple Categories

Click For Summary
A composite ranking system is being developed to evaluate houses based on multiple categories like affordability, location, and design, each with varying importance levels. The proposed method involves multiplying a house's ranking in each category by the category's importance, summing these scores, and normalizing them to create a percentage match score. Concerns are raised about the simplicity of this approach and potential inaccuracies. Suggestions include evaluating existing ranking systems like Borda, Condorcet, and Range against a set of attributes to determine the most effective method. The goal is to establish a relevant score value for each house that accurately reflects its overall ranking.
unam1292
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hey all,

So the idea is that I'm trying to create a composite ranking system of items that are already in different categories. For example, suppose there are 4 houses that a buyer is choosing from. These 4 houses are ranked 1-4 in each of the categories such as affordability, location, and design. These categories are then rated Very Important to Not Important (1-4, respectively). I want to create a final ranking of the housings based on this data. What's the best way to do this?

What I've thought of:

Pick a house, and multiply its ranking in a category by the importance of that category. Continue to do this for that house for each category, continuing to add to the score. Then divide this score by the maximum score which is the summation of the importance values. Then finally multiply this by 100 to get a percentage match score.

Here's the idea:
Ʃ(house ranking in a category*importance of that category)/Ʃ(importances) * 100

I feel like this is too simplistic and results in error. What would be a better way?

The important thing is coming up with a relevant score value for each house. I've looked at Borda, Condorcet, and Range systems as examples, but I'm not sure what is best.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Ʃ(house ranking in a category*importance of that category) does all the work.
The rest is just 'normalization' - scaling for convenience.

With this scheme the lower the score the better:
A house ranked #1 in all 4 categories would have a score of 10.
A house ranked #4 in all 4 categories would have a score of 40.
 


unam1292 said:
The important thing is coming up with a relevant score value for each house. I've looked at Borda, Condorcet, and Range systems as examples, but I'm not sure what is best.

Why don't you evaluate the Borda, Condorcet and Range systems according to a set of attributes, rank those attributes for importance and then select the system that scores best?
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K